#160 matching numbers 69 240zed for sale brisbane

[44014]

its got lots of new stuff very little rust only in sills $4000 of suspension and some kick arse wheels if you wanna see it go my gallary its needs the body to be done and a set of rings soon if not sold soon i will rebuild the motor and the price will go up any way BUY MY CAR !

$7000

contact me on 0404053359

or 0734222166

ask for doug

[240 in OZ]

Do you have documentation to back up your claim of the 1969 status of this car.

[44014]

well it sais 00160 on the body thats enough proof for me

[240 in OZ]

Total BS mate! If it was a LHD car it would be a 69.

Note that RHD VIN#004 was a 70 model; how the heck could yours be a 69.

[44014]

no it wasnt i know the guy who now owns #4 and i do believe its a 69 matey

[halz]

Lets not get into a flame war here...

44014, can you give the date of manufacture as stamped on the compliance place as well as the Chassis number. There is often quite a difference between the manuf. date and the date of first registration...

[Zedrally]

Build date or import date?

It has long been viewed that the first 240 imports into Oz occured early in the first half of 1970. 004 was documented as an import around the first half of the year [1970].

There is a thread buried somewhere on this site, the discussion was approx, 2 years ago if memory serves me right, with all the relevent information and as much as we all would like to believe that 004 was the oldest surviving zed in the world built and imported into Oz in 69, the reality is that it wasn't.

I would doubt that 160 could claim a build or import date of 69 either.

[240 in OZ]

Who now owns 004? Members on this list have been trying to find its whereabouts for some time now?

Regards

Joseph

[halz]

Was #004 manufactured in 1969? If not, then there is no way that #160 could be.

Apart from all this debate, I'm sure most would agree that #160 with matching numbers is still a desirable car!

[Zedrally]

Originally posted by 44014

no it wasnt i know the guy who now owns #4 and i do believe its a 69 matey

Ah, we now now that 004 was SOLD. If you know the new owner then you would be able to request the documentation that the original owners prepared in their quest for information on the origins of 004.

They held the view that is different to your statement, however we also now that the assemble line didn't roll cars out in consequential numbers either. but the difference between 4 & 160 is to great.

Regardless, #160 with matching numbers would be a great accquisition, please promise not to sell it to someone who wants to run Targa Tas...........

MOM

[halz]

please promise not to sell it to someone who wants to run Targa Tas...........

hear-hear...no more butchered 240z with EFI L28s please... that's what 260Zs are for :tapemouth

[44014]

a man by the name of peter cambell now ownes number #4

a very rich buisness man it has um what he called safari flares on the back now and it is in pieces he is planning to restore the car to pristine condition and well he told me it was a 69

any way i dont really care its still got the early body

i just want some one to buy it and do it up to concours condition and sell it back to me for half the price:)