Crossfire vs Z

[hls30.com]

OOPS! Still, Chrysler and GM have been swapping spit and pieces for years!

Still an existing parts bin raid on wheels! Not that that is necessarily a bad thing, just not new and different!

Will

[Fun_in_my_z]

Yes they have. But the Zed is always queen

[240ZX]

Ok, so what do you get when you mix together a Crossfire, VW beetle, Audi TT, and a pipe dream....add in good handling and performance??? :stupid: :stupid:

You quessed it...........A 350Z

[sblake01]

hey, better than bush

Nothing is better than . . . no, I'd better not! :devious:

(Sorry, AxtellZ, I posted before I read yours)

[Gee]

The crossfire new? Please.. it's based heavily on the Mercedes SLK which is now HOW old? I find it funny that Nissan took all the best things about 60's sportscars, added reliability and Japanese flair to make an affordable sportscar that destroyed the British motor industry.

In reply, some 35 years later an American manufacturer tries to do the same by copying the Germans and all they can come up with is a different body-kit.. :stupid:

[hls30.com]

What he said!

Will

[Alfadog]

To me, the Crossfire reminds me much more of the AMC Pacer.

[2-4-T-Z-MAN]

The only way the crossfire and the 240 are related is if there was some funny business going on in the parts bin. You know kissing cousins.

[hls30.com]

Come on now, what have you got against the Pacer! GM even made a special Bicentennial version! The crosfire reminds me of the little white speck on the top of chicken shi-oop, that was supposed to be a thought not a type!

Seriously it is a good car, just no Pacer-er Z!

Will

[Inf]

did someone say boobs in here?

[hls30.com]

No, but it needed to be said, thanks!

Will

[Fun_in_my_z]

Boobs..where!