civ104 Posted January 15, 2005 Share #61 Posted January 15, 2005 I'd certainly entertain at least one set. Keep us apprised of your progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1GENZED Posted January 15, 2005 Share #62 Posted January 15, 2005 I am having a difficult time finding a supplier for the right alloy(evidently it is rare) of stainless steel for the trim, Hi WillWhat is the numerical code of alloy you are looking for and thickness.I work as a machinist at UofT, and we use alot of rare types of metal. Maybe I can get a sheet or two of what your looking for.We all appreciate your hard work. Thanks.Ahmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hls30.com Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share #63 Posted January 16, 2005 I believe it is T346, .020" I'll check my notes tomorrow.Thanks,Will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240Zdragon72 Posted January 16, 2005 Share #64 Posted January 16, 2005 Hey Will, I too am interested. The ones I have from MSA, the rubber trim dosen't come close to the edge of the scoop. There is atleast a half inch gap in one place. Maybe I have it on wrong, but I went by the guage it came with.Good luck with the project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leif Posted January 16, 2005 Share #65 Posted January 16, 2005 I am interested too, and ready to pay the shipping to me in Norway!Good luck with the project! :-)1972 240z imported from CALeif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1GENZED Posted January 26, 2005 Share #66 Posted January 26, 2005 I believe it is T346, .020" I'll check my notes tomorrow.Thanks,WillHi WillI have done a search and the closest number I can get is 347I don't think it's what your looking for, because it is a high strength titanium alloy used for hi stress parts on aircraft... It is supposed to have similar machining properties as 321.I have machined 321, and it is very hard to work with. Cost wise, your looking at about $400Cdn a sheet. Ouch!Ahmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hls30.com Posted January 26, 2005 Author Share #67 Posted January 26, 2005 I double checked my information, and I found conflicts between the sources and my notes. What I need is 436(or close) not 346. That damned Dyslexia...The alloy must be readily formable, and not prone to work harden appreciably(rules out T304). Will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted January 26, 2005 Share #68 Posted January 26, 2005 Hi Will because it is a high strength titanium alloy used for hi stress parts on aircraft... Cool!! Will, I'll take the titanium headlight covers ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hls30.com Posted January 26, 2005 Author Share #69 Posted January 26, 2005 Hey Mike, the first set goes on my car! Titanium don't bend too easily!Will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF Posted January 27, 2005 Share #70 Posted January 27, 2005 To ease manufacturing and costs you could use the best available covers?and produce the rims in copper or brass and chrome plate.This would be a much easier material to work with?I dont how well the after market covers replicate the originals or if they will be suitable for the rims.Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hls30.com Posted January 27, 2005 Author Share #71 Posted January 27, 2005 NickFTo keep the original appearance,and to improve the longevity thereof, a specific thickness of material must be used, the materials you suggested would be too maleable in the needed thickness to support the mounting hardware without deforming. The available headlight covers are smaller, they actually fit inside the opening, whereas the JDM variety actually lay on top(they are larger) of the headlight bucket, in addition, the mounting hardware for the JDM version does not actually attatch throught the actual cover material, but instread olny attatches through the rim.I have considered using a stronger alloy of aluminum and after polishing, and either annodizing with a very slight blueish tint to simulate chrome plating, or actually chrome plating.I appreciate any and all suggestions, I want these to be a welcome and awe inspiring addition to our cars, and any suggestions to improve (initially with no appearane changes) them will be taken seriously.Thanks for your input,Will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1GENZED Posted January 29, 2005 Share #72 Posted January 29, 2005 Hi WillNo hit on 436 either.It jumps from 431 to 440.I don't think you want to use any of the 400 series stainless.I think for the properties your looking for, 304 would be the best.It's better for stamping and drawing, relatively.Doesn't have problems with intergranular corrosion.It reacts very well to welding. Welds harden very slightly.You don't have to anneal it after welding, to maintain its corrosion resistance.You can get it from McMaster-CarrThe sheet can be ordered with a finish polished surface, but has a minimum thickness of .025" and 36"x96" your looking at $100Cdn a sheet.Man, I sound like a salesman.Anyway, I would like to hear more from you about your forming method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now