Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

300 miles without missing a beat!!


Recommended Posts

Drove to the Sunny coast for a few days during the week and decided to take the datto instead of the big blue beast (International Scout in my gallery) I had replaced the rear left hand wheel bearings last week, so at least that was a lot quieter. For future reference, the inner bearing is a real pain to drive into the housing. Filled up with fuel as I left home and hit the highway. The thing did the trip without a worry averaging about 70mph (125 km/h) for the trip, with a 15-20 minute stint sitting on 90-95mph (140-150km/h :finger: ) at the end. Drove around in heavy traffic and lots of lights for about 50 miles, then came home a few days later. Stopped to fill up half way back and found out that I got about 10L per 100km in the way of fuel economy.

Who needs a new car when a 30+ year old one can do a long trip in style with no worries what so ever and even get good use of petrol. Long live the Z

p.s. sorry about the mixed measurement units but some things I can't convert off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Can't complain about that, considering the engine is straight out of a parts car I bought for $200. Just dropped it in and bolted on the twin carbs and extractors.

Why pay 40 grand for a honda that gets 50 mpg? You will never save that much in fuel, plus you look like a dork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been watching a TV program called "NOPI vision" which is all about the ricer phenomema. Some of the peole, as I remember, have "invested?" as much as $80,000 in their car?!!??

Just to have custom bodywork that makes it hard to tell what car you started with, DVD, COLORED leather everywhere, a 'sound system' louder than open extractors, and interor appointments that look like a Christmas tree when you switch the lights on.

thx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my mates just dropped 4g's on a paintjob for his pulsar. Has a nice kit and that, and looks nice but that's a lot of money for looks alone. Another mate has put about 6 grand into his ford laser, but for that he got a turbo engine, bigger turbo, water to air intercooler, race seats, lowered springs and the such. Hasn't spend much on looks, but it still looks tough as and is quick. (I don't want to try race him)

My car is a 73 model, but now sports an L28 from a 280zx. Never had a problem with the L24 though, just wanted more go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just on my calculations 10L per 100kms/ (divided by) 4.54 litres to the gallon = 2.202 gallons. 100kms = 62.5miles/ 2.202 = 28.38mpg. This was how i was taught to convert by an old hand is this correct??

The way u drove that sounds like pretty dam good fuel economy, on a trip to Canberra (565kms) my 76' 260Z 2+2 with L28 and 240Z SU's returned me 33mpg driving like a grandma through the gears (it killed me!) but i was blown away with the economy. Considering the 240Z weighs around 1100kg and my 260Z over the weigh bridge weighed 1350kg i am very interested to see how it fairs when i put all that gear in the 240Z its gotta be better again!

So i agree speedy why have a Honda (unless its a NSX ssshhh!!) LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just on my calculations 10L per 100kms/ (divided by) 4.54 litres to the gallon = 2.202 gallons. 100kms = 62.5miles/ 2.202 = 28.38mpg. This was how i was taught to convert by an old hand is this correct??

The difference is because a US Gallon is equal to 3.8 litres, where the imperial (what the rest of use) is equal to 4.54 litres. Why is this so?? (apologies to Prof. Julius Sumner-Miller...! Who here is old enough to remember him? LOL )

When I bought my 240K auto last June, I paid my $700, drove it 1100+ klms home for an average of 29mpg...didn't miss a beat, still hasn't 12000K's later, with an average of 430 K's per tank, or about 24mpg around Sydney! These Nissan sixes really are a good motor. Even the C10, with the triple Mikunis, lumpy cam and short diff gears gave 23 mpg Melbourne - Sydney, around 900 K's

I'm happy.

Jim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You both came up with tha same figure, really. If you divide Imperial gallons by US gallons and multiply Tomohawk's figure you get gs72s20's figure. And yes, I remember Professor Julius Sumner-Miller. (Why is it so?) I think he passed away about 1987 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.