Upon seeing 4-door C110's many of my friends have remarked at how UNCOOL the 4-doors were and how totally grandma-spec they looked. Nothing amazing, exciting or desirable. The below link is for all you 4-door owners... inspiration, and possibly something to throw back in their faces when they say anything bad!! Look for yourself. :devious:

http://page4.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/d58633116

Those are 16x9.5 and 16x11s.... :o

Yeah. 4 doors are way UNCOOL . . . . until they blow your doors off. I've taken on several idiots here that don't realize that my way UNCOOL taxi-cab spec 4 door has a six cylinder motor backed by a 5-speed tranny. I don't need to talk trash . . . . the car does it for me.

That looks hot, I must say it's the best 4 door I've seen and yet it's so simple. I have to get a set of Wat's like that .

I also love the engine sure hopes mine looks that good. Did I mention I've got a set of Triple Mikuni's on the way 44's to be precise.

If I was a multi-millionaire I'd have a huge factory full of cool Nissan/Datsun's

Ahh fantastic!!! :D THE toughest 4-door ive seen, 'specially with those 16" wats!! Interestingly, i know a few people who PREFER the look of the sedan, as it is a more balanced shape, at least in their eyes. Their argument stems from there being 'too much meat around the c-pillar of the coupe.' Personally, i reckon both shapes are well executed, the coupe a little more voluptuous...

Just about any old car that hasnt been hotted up with a nice set of fat mags and a shiney new coat of paint will get called grandma spec.

Meh, who cares. doesnt bother me.

Thats a nice looking 4 door. Seen one like it before.

I read that the 4 door is actually lighter than the coupe because it has the b pillars to strengthen the chassis, and the coupe is pillarless so it has extra strengthening in the chassis to make make up, resulting in more weight.

I also read that the 4 door c110 was made second, and that both the 2 and 4 door are exactly the same lenght / wheelbase.

The design does looks balanced though! It really fits. Maybe its the way the car is designed but I like it!

Yup, true on both counts! Same length, width and wheelbase - the hardtop is 10mm lower though.

1973
WEIGHT	Sedan	Hardtop
Manual	1170	1180
Auto	1190	1200

1976 & 1977
WEIGHT	Sedan	Hardtop
Manual	1200	1210
Auto	1215	1225

This information came from three owner's manuals, so the change in weight may not have occurred in 1976. In fact, it probably changed when the model was updated in 1975.

Really? Well mine is almost as late as they come 11/1975 c110, and the weight is still quoted as 1170kg on the VIN plate...

Curious... well I guess that means the change in weight occured in December or later! (you just missed 30kg, lucky! )

that sedan gives me great insporation ive never seen one that tough not only are the rims great but the flares look awsome and its so low that looks sik!

thanks for the insporation

Here's my inspiration, just change the wheels to Watanabes:smoke:

Note the rear panel on the white 4door!

Hey There

To me, i really find the 4 door more cooler than the 2 door

i really love the 4 door Datsun 240K C110 GT

Thanks anyway!

Here's my inspiration, just change the wheels to Watanabes:smoke:

Note the rear panel on the white 4door!

Jim,

Just outta curiousity, what car is that in your avatar? Don't think I've ever seen it before!

Rick