Esteves Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share #13 Posted June 16, 2006 Yes, the third one should be dated 06-09-2006, not 2004.Yes, it's been two years and you'll notice that back in 2004 (after the new cat was put on), the CO levels for both 15 MPH and 25 MPH were very low at 0.01.The oil is the same oil from 2004. I never reached 3000 miles, so I never changed it. I'll change the oil to see if that helps.The spark plugs on it are fairly new (changed in 2005). They were previously fouled because of the short distance driving. I'll probably check them out as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74-26Ounce Posted June 16, 2006 Share #14 Posted June 16, 2006 Esteves, You’ll pass with no problems down under... Looking at these emissions prompted me to check out what the rules are in Australia for comparison. In Queensland, for pre-1986 vehicles, the percentage volume of carbon monoxide should not exceed 4.5 per cent and 400ppm hydrocarbons. (For post-1986 vehicles, emissions should not exceed 2 per cent carbon monoxide and 250ppm hydrocarbons.) [source http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/qt/LTASinfo.nsf/index/aircare_testing]I now have a bit more of an understanding on the emission restrictions put on the Zeds over there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddezso Posted June 17, 2006 Share #15 Posted June 17, 2006 Wait a minute - high octane fuel is worse for emission readings than lower octane? Is that right? Believe me - I dont know one way or another but it seems counter-intuitave.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now