Rogersz Posted February 7, 2007 Share #13 Posted February 7, 2007 Also the 2+2 still has the flat tops and is running quite good ,the cars is upto 103,000 KLM'SCheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Camouflage Posted February 7, 2007 Share #14 Posted February 7, 2007 Rogersz, you must be joking. I've owned 2 260's and both have the overheating problem in summer. I dread taking my current one out if the temp is over 30.Please tell us/me how you've managed to avoid this problem? Move to Tasmania Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedrally Posted February 7, 2007 Share #15 Posted February 7, 2007 ZedrallyI,m not an expert on 260z , perhaps the other 260z owners in OZ and N.Z. could let us know how their cars cooling system performed provided of course that the system is in god condition. With the two 260's that I have had ,the 2 seaters { 5spd} radiator was coroded out so I replaced it with a good second hand one from an automatic, that car also had British SU'S ( no problems) The second car a 2+2 also a manual has the original radiator and air cond. I took it out last Sunday for a 2 1/2 hour drive in the Adelaide hills it was 41 deg C , with the Air cond on the guage went up to 3/4 thats about as high as I would normally let any of my cars go, it normally sits at just below half at Temps below about 35 c. I was thinking of getting my Radiator cleaned out but it may already be as good as its going to get without increasig the core size. By your own admission one car didn't have the original SU's, hence no problem. in the second case you write that you "went for a drive" with no problem, I certainly wouldn't have expected a problem either with the drive part, it's the subsequent starting after stopping the IS the problem with any flat top SU in 40 degree heat. Oh, before you ask, the cooling system is in perfect condition, new radiator, hoses and head re-condition with little more than 10k since restoration. The asbestos insulation around the fuel rails has however been removed, is yours still intact? The one I had in the late 70's was exactly the same and all other owners that I have spoke to reported similar problems, many of us put up with the problem knowing that after stopping you would not try to re-start the motor within 1-2 hours! Sometimes, it would/will fire up immediately, but that was the exception rather than the rule. Perhaps you have the exception to the rule car which Nissan should have studied to solve the ills of 260 owners? I think Mr. C has the best solution........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogersz Posted February 8, 2007 Share #16 Posted February 8, 2007 Zedrally I see what your main complaint is with the hot restart, if mine has sat for 5 minutes after a hot run it can take upto 3 to 5 seconds to start. Has anyone here had success with eliminating the hot restart issue byfitting the 240Z round top hitchi's.Roger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony D Posted February 15, 2007 Share #17 Posted February 15, 2007 Do you mean HLS30? because that's an entirely different thing to HS30 and S30. There arent many S30's in the USA - only ones that were privately imported from Japan.No, I mean S30. I was relating what I have seen on the imported S30's as a matter of anecdotal historical reference. If others have Fairlady Z's that can pin the production switch down further to a closer range of VINS, e-mail me so I can add them to 'my list'.I kind of informally track S30's here in the USA. Anthropological disease, if you will.I find our US-Market versions slightly less fun than the Fairlady due to weight and lack of accessories. These I currently posess:S30-06223HLS30-06330GS31-XXXXXX (can't remember that one offhand)S130-002XXX (same there)Once owned S30-110661. Myself and Alan both are at a loss to explain that wierd amalgam of parts. No Nissan Restamps of the VIN on that one, though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZeder Posted February 15, 2007 Share #18 Posted February 15, 2007 Ok I own a 1976 260z 2 seater that originally had the flat-top SU carbs - (the car was restored to original when I purchased it - however rust came back and it is under going a second rebuild with some mods at the same time).Anyway I never had any issues that I recall - however my car was not fitted with air-con.Can someone confirm this is one of the reason for the introduction of the vented bonnet? I know that the NZ spec cars never had the vented bonnet but some of the Australian cars did - I can only assume this is due to the fact that it get hotter in Australia than NZ so this issue occured in AU. Also NZ does not, and still does not have any emissions standards or tests (well not 100% ture as of Oct 2006 a a five second visible smoke check will be introduced for vehicles as part of warrant of fitness (WoF) and certificate of fitness (CoF) inspections. We have these WoF or CoF, depends on the type and size of the vechile but generally a WoF is for Car/Motorbike/Tailer and CoF is for a truck, every 6 months (unless the vechile is new or least than 5 years old then the test is carried out once a year)...so that is the emissions test we have - if it has visible smoke during a 5 second rev/run then it fails all at the decression of the tester)I was also told by an ex Nissan Japan employee that the Fairlady 260Z was recalled had there engines replace and chassis re stamped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Beck Posted February 16, 2007 Share #19 Posted February 16, 2007 ...snipped.. They were being forced to make changes that would cause the cars to fail Japan's extremely strict emissions laws ( some of the strictest in the world at that point, I believe ) and a proper cure would have meant a complete re-design of the fuel system and maybe even different carbs. ....snipped....I think the spec of the domestic L26 concerned would have been different to the export spec L26 ( different carbs and more emissions equipment at least) so that's why they treated them differently. ...snipped..And like most of these kinds of story, it is difficult to pin down the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I think Nissan would probably prefer us not to know!Alan T.Hi Alan:Could be simply because there were only a few cars involved, that it was more acceptable to simply buy them back when they didn't satisfy their customers.It would seem that in 1974, stricter standards for automotive emissions than those of 1973, may have existed in certain prefectures of Japan, but not on a National Level. According to the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, the National Laws that sat specific standards for the first time in Japan, for HC, NOx and which incorporated earlier standards for CO were released in Dec. of 72 and took effect in March of 73. They stayed the same until they were increased for the cars produced in the 1975 fiscal year. Which would explain why the L20A's could be used in the cars recalled or repurchased without modifications in 73 and 74.As the US Spec. 260-Z's did comply with the far more strict emissions standards in effect here in the U.S. for 1974, I would think that it would have been easier to meet the Japanese Standards that covered the period 73 though 75. Japan did set far more stringent standards for 1978 related to NOx... but then later delayed its actual implementation until 1985. The US Spec. 280-Z's did meet the 78 standards for 78, which were about the same as those originally proposed for Japan for 78. For that matter the Z32's could not meet the even more stringent US Emissions Standards for 1996, but they could continue to be sold in Japan. For the most part Japan's Automotive Emissions and Safety Standards followed, but lagged and sometimes far behind those of the U.S.While the Japanese Automobile Manufacturers were somewhat successful in gaining delays or lowering Emissions and Safety Standards here in the US, along with the US Manufacturers - they held far more power in delaying or holding Japanese Emissions and Safety Standards back in Japan.There is an interesting review of Japans Environmental Controls titled<a href="http://www.yale.edu/leitner/pdf/1999-01.pdf" TARGET=NEW> The Political Economy of Japanese Pollution Regulation</a>, by Michael F. Thies, UCLA and Frances Rosenbluth, Yale University.It's an interesting bit of Nissan trivia - but when NISSAN USA was reorganized in 1966 Mr. Katayama became President of Nissan Motors USA, and Mr. Kawamata as given the assignment of representing Nissan Motors Japan in legislative matters related to Automotive Emissions and Safety Standards here in the US.. Mr. Kawamata was an Engineer and fluent in English, he reported directly to the President of Nissan Motors Ltd. in that capacity. In 1967 he also became Chairman of the newly formed Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA), he had previously served as Chairman of the Automotive Industrial Association (JAMA's predecessor). In this capacity he also indirectly represented Aichi Kikai, Isuzu, Kawasaki, Suzuki, Daihatsu, Toyota, Toyo Kogyo, Hino, Fuji Heavy Industries, Bridgestone Cycle, Honda, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Yamaha for matters related to US Legislation. FWIW,Carl B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Beck Posted February 16, 2007 Share #20 Posted February 16, 2007 Oops... sorry.... da... not Kawamata...but - -Mr. Kawazoe was the VP that was in the US and assigned to work with D.C....It also seems that the time allowed to Edit Posts is far too short !Carl B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakijo Posted February 16, 2007 Share #21 Posted February 16, 2007 Rogersz and Mike . . .What kind of flat top Hitachis are on your cars? From what I have seen on Yahoo Japan, there are round mouth flat top carbs. I'm no expert, but the main complaint in the US seems to stem from the square mouth carbs and replacing them with earlier 240Z round tops (with round mouths) fixes the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zedrally Posted February 16, 2007 Share #22 Posted February 16, 2007 Miles,There is no argument about "how to fix...", it has been well known here that replacing them(flat tops) with earlier round tops fixs the problem.Roger & yourself should re-read my post as you both seem to have a different view.Flat tops in OZ have ALWAYS been problematic, that is why I'd be interested in how Roger managed to fix a problem that Nissan wasn't able to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogersz Posted February 18, 2007 Share #23 Posted February 18, 2007 Sakijo Mine are square mouth types, Zedrally I have already mentioned that my car also takes longer to start after it has sat for a short while after a hot weather run but it does not have a problem with the running temp of the engine. Note I dont know if the current radiator core has an extra row of cores or not. If running temp is the major issue increasing the core size of the radiator seems to work for most cars.Cheers Roger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sakijo Posted February 18, 2007 Share #24 Posted February 18, 2007 I have read many times here about the problems of the flat tops with the square mouths. I am just curious about the flat tops with the round mouths. I thought that Roger may have had those. Apparently, the round mouth flat tops were a Japan only carb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now