August 21, 200717 yr comment_219302 ONe of our club members put together the specs from Road&Track magazine for each of the Z aand ZX models produced...including the 350Z. http://www.tizcc.ca/zeds.htmGWGarrardThousand Island Zed Car Club Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219302 Share on other sites More sharing options...
August 21, 200717 yr Author comment_219304 Ahh, interesting daddz ... I had always assumed that the weight on the door-jamb plate was, the weight of the car. My bad sir, thank you for catching this oversight! Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219304 Share on other sites More sharing options...
August 21, 200717 yr Author comment_219305 Ahh, interesting daddz ... I had always assumed that the weight on the door-jamb plate was, the weight of the car. My bad sir, thank you for catching this oversight! EDIT: Quickly going back to the topic about the Top Gear show and the obvious bias against american vehicles... I watched the video of the Ford GT test drive that guy did... he loved it so much he took it home... well the GT-X anyway. He said, "This car is like the American Navy, created by the British, and then improved on" or something to that effect... I'll have to go find it. Oops... looks like I clicked quote instead of edit... sorry folks!! Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219305 Share on other sites More sharing options...
August 21, 200717 yr comment_219318 As I mentioned earlier the test was poorly done and all for the fellows personal gain. There was no interest in doing a true performance comparison. A range of 0-xxx speeds and braking performance, handling, etc would have been the right thing to do. Off the top of my head here is what I think the outcome would be given an average of total performance. This is PURE opinion1st place 300zTT2nd 350Zfollowed by240 (handling isn't so hot w/o rear sway B.) 260280280zxI did a quick look at the 0-60 of the 350Z and it's much faster than the 240. Norm Simpers old, slightly modified 240 (way before his 12sec car) would do about 145 tops.My '71 struggles to get to 130 and is close to stock.Fuel for the fire:) Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219318 Share on other sites More sharing options...
August 22, 200717 yr Author comment_219354 As I mentioned earlier the test was poorly done and all for the fellows personal gain. There was no interest in doing a true performance comparison. A range of 0-xxx speeds and braking performance, handling, etc would have been the right thing to do. Off the top of my head here is what I think the outcome would be given an average of total performance. This is PURE opinion1st place 300zTT 2nd 350Z followed by 240 (handling isn't so hot w/o rear sway B.) 260 280 280zx I did a quick look at the 0-60 of the 350Z and it's much faster than the 240. Norm Simpers old, slightly modified 240 (way before his 12sec car) would do about 145 tops. My '71 struggles to get to 130 and is close to stock. Fuel for the fire:) Hrm, interesting... but you've left a few out ... NA Z32/Z31 300zx, Z31 300ZXT and, of course, the 280ZXT Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219354 Share on other sites More sharing options...
August 22, 200717 yr comment_219430 I'm just going with cars I've seen raced over the years. Basing things on the principle of "well if this car beat that one but was beat by that other... etc etc. I've known people with these models. Whether or not they knew how to drive them competitively is another story. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/25258-interesting-video/?&page=3#findComment-219430 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment