Happy Birthday!

[EScanlon]

To all you New Year's Day Babies....who would have thought that ALL of you would end up being Z lovers!

E

[full house]

Hi! thanks!!! Its also my birth day . . .

[hls30.com]

I wonder how many members were started in a Z on New Years eve....

Working the math backwards, how many September members do we have....

and of those how many in their late thirtys with parental units that were original owners...

Will

[geezer]

Will, that's taking Z research to new horizons,LOLbut I've got to admit, the same thought crossed my mind.

[TomoHawk]

My other dad ws born on New Year's eve, so everybody gets to party on his b-Day. I also have friends that were born on Christmas eve, Christmas day, and New Year's day.

I think it must be really neat that there are people born every minute of every day.

thxZ

[EScanlon]

Ok Will, time to take your shoes off and do the math again....

Babies born Jan 1 would not have been conceived in September! While your kids may seem to grow up real fast, they did take approximately 9 months and not weeks.

So, now you can start looking at folks meanderings in late March / early April.

Tomo, and every SECOND of each minute....just think of the possibilities!!!

Sorry, couldn't resist...

E

[MikeW]

I wonder how many members were started in a Z on New Years eve....

Working the math backwards, how many September members do we have....

and of those how many in their late thirtys with parental units that were original owners...

Will

Ok Will, time to take your shoes off and do the math again....

Babies born Jan 1 would not have been conceived in September! While your kids may seem to grow up real fast, they did take approximately 9 months and not weeks.

When Will said started in a Z on New Years eve he wasn't talking about being born in a Z. That would be really amazing. He should have said working the math forwards instead of backwards.

[sblake01]

Well, to properly work the math, if you start with January 1, October 1 would actually be 9 months later-not September 1.

[MikeW]

Well, to properly work the math, if you start with January 1, October 1 would actually be 9 months later-not September 1.

That's scary, my birthday is Oct. 2.

Technically it's not 9 months but rather 40 weeks. Even more technical is the fact that the clock starts with her last period which is about 2 weeks before conception so the middle of September would be more accurate. Even though 40 (really only 38) weeks is considered full term babies can easily be born a couple of weeks early with no problem. My wife is currently at 34 weeks but we'll probably induce a week early. The OB is even willing to induce two weeks early.

[EScanlon]

In looking the post over later, Will had said Started, so my bad.

Additionally, since I don't have kids, I did not recall from HS Biology 40 weeks (or 38) or ... just the 9 month figure.

Which since by general accounting figures each month is roughly 4.345 weeks (365 divided by 7 then by 12) = 39 weeks.... aaaaarggghhhh....

Ok, my bad.....

E

[sblake01]

I thought that figure was derived by dividing 52 weeks by 12 or 4.333 weeks per month but 365/7/12 actually equals roughly 4.345 not 39 as you said. I also think we're putting waaaaaaay too much thought into this:)

[EScanlon]

...Which since by general accounting figures each month is roughly 4.345 weeks (365 divided by 7 then by 12) X 9 = 39.1 weeks.... aaaaarggghhhh....

Ok, my bad.....

E

Correction noted....NOW are you happy??

... I also think we're putting waaaaaaay too much thought into this:)

I agree.

Or are you competing with Tom..... OK, OK, MY BAD AGAIN.....

Just kidding Stephen