Posted July 22, 200816 yr comment_254201 I did my research and decided on the 81/83 zx 5 speed and a later switch to a 3.9 or 4.11 diff.... Saved my money and ordered a rebuilt from a reputable z shop that does tranny rebuilds. There was some confusion evidently because they sent me a 77/79 z 5 speed. Not the ratio I wanted, I'm very disapointed because now they tell me they don't have one within the years I want and I have this fresh 77/79 sitting on my front porch. They have offered a refund if I want but I thought I would get some input from others that have run this tranny, before I go to the trouble of shipping it back. How bad is it? Is second gear right on top of first like the #'s show and how bad is the jump from second to third? Also, are there any advantages to the shorter 5th gear? I would appreciate any input I can get, includiny any recomendations on rear gearing.Thanks, neal Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 22, 200816 yr comment_254212 I have the close-ratio. I'd much rather have a longer first gear, and a wider spread on the rest of the gears, based on my typical usage pattern- which of course might vary from yours. Having never driven this other trans, I unfortunately can't compare based on my actual experience- something I really want to do for my own knowledge. But as much as I love my Z, I do wish I had different gearing, FWIW. As well as adding an LSD too. FYI I turn 3,500rpm at 80mph in 5th on the flats, which is not bad at all. Allegedly, ahem. I'll do this when the rebuild time comes- hopefully in many, many years! Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254212 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 22, 200816 yr comment_254213 I definitely prefer the late 5 spd. The big difference is 2nd to 3rd. While on the track I could redline the tach in 2nd and when I shifted to 3rd there was a big drop in rpm almost to the point of chugging. I went from a 4 spd to the late 5 spd.It depends how much spirited driving you are going to do. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254213 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254228 I would keep the engine and find a 77 or 78 rolling shell to put it into. =) Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254228 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254233 Like Darrel said, the gap from 2nd to 3rd is too big in my opinion with the early 5 speeds. (The first 4 gears are the same as the 4 speed if that gives you a point of reference.) I'm sure you're hoping to hear that it's a reasonable compromise, but I'd send it back and wait until I could find what I wanted. BTW, a late 5 speed with 4.11 diff is a sweet combination. I couldn't be happier with that combination both on the street and on the track. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254233 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254237 I second 240ZMan, the later 5 speed is sweet! Wish I could get a 4.11 diff, someday! Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254237 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254240 Wish I could get a 4.11 diff, someday!FWIW, I found mine in as the front diff of a nissan 720 (pickup) 4x4. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254240 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254247 Like Darrel said, the gap from 2nd to 3rd is too big in my opinion with the early 5 speeds. (The first 4 gears are the same as the 4 speed if that gives you a point of reference.) Not true. Been argued before here and on other sites and I won't argue it any further here but the first four gears are not the same on a 77-78 5spd and the early 4 speed. I'll just say, look it up. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254247 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254248 sblake I don't think he ment the early 5 speed have the same ratio as the early early 4speed (which they aren't) but the "early" 5 speeds (that is, the 77-78 version) has the same first 4 as the same year 4 speed, and to use that as a reference if say, he had a late model 4 speed laying around. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254248 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 23, 200816 yr comment_254253 I should have been more clear. If you normalize the ratios using 3rd as a baseline, then you see that for the 4 speed 1st is 2.50 times 3rd, and 2nd is 1.55 times 3rd. For the early 5 speed, 1st is 2.54 times 3rd and 2nd is 1.59 times 3rd. In other words, on a relative basis, 1st, 2nd and 3rd gears are all the same (within a small tolerance) for those two transmissions. If you were to swap the early 5 speed and leave the 3.36 diff, then 1st, 2nd, and 3rd would all provide slower acceleration than with the 4 speed. If you were to swap the diff to 3.54 at the same time, then 1st - 3rd would be almost the same as before. You would still have a relatively large change in ratio going from 2nd to 3rd. The later 5 speed has 3rd gear closer to 2nd which was the point Darrel and I were originally making. Perhaps these 2 screen shots from the transmission calculator will make it more clear. Note that the max speed in the first 3 gears is nearly the same for both combinations. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254253 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 24, 200816 yr comment_254263 sblake I don't think he ment the early 5 speed have the same ratio as the early early 4speed (which they aren't) but the "early" 5 speeds (that is, the 77-78 version) has the same first 4 as the same year 4 speed, and to use that as a reference if say, he had a late model 4 speed laying around.I was comparing the type B 4 speed to the 77-79 5 speed strictly by gear ratio. Not the type A 3 piece 'monkey motion' early 4 speed. My point stands, the gear ratios in the trans are not the same. I won't bother posting the chart. It's already on the site somewhere. If you want to go on thinking they're the same that's up to you. It's really a rather moot point anyway. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254263 Share on other sites More sharing options...
July 24, 200816 yr comment_254264 well, from what i saw on zhome, the 77-79 4 speed and 5 speed share the same gear ratios..... Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/28799-280z-5-speed-how-bad-is-it/#findComment-254264 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment