Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Front x-member repair: pros & cons


Seppi72

Recommended Posts

My '72 is all sandblasted and epoxy primed and rust repair is underway.:classic: I know what's ahead of me for the next few weeks, but I'd like the opinions of those who have "gone before me" on one aspect. That is what to do when repairing the rust damage on the front crossmember. A photo of the current situation is attached.

While it's not blatantly obvious from the photo, there is rust-through on the backside of the x-member between the oval openings. It is worse between some than between others. Numbering the ovals 1-6 from L to R, there is no apparent rust between 1-2 and the worst is between 3-4. I think you can see the extent on the others.

My thought is to (1) remove the entire back "wall" of the x-member, (2) treat the inside surfaces with sandblasting, Ospho and an appropriate coating (POR-15 ?), and (3) weld in a solid wall piece.

I frankly don't understand the purpose of the factory openings and I don't see what harm would attach to eliminating them in my rebuild. There are plenty of drainage openings on the underside of the x-member and I could always create more.:P Besides, I could always create a template and paint black ovals on the new solid piece to give the OEM effect.ROFL

Let me state that I am NOT going for a restoration here and this car will NEVER see winter driving while I own it although it will likely see some rain.

So, if any of you have insight into what Datsun was thinking regarding the design of this piece, I'd like to know.:geek: And, certainly, I want to know what you think of my proposed fix - pro, con or ambivalent.

post-1248-14150804132798_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The openings are probably just for weight reduction.

Steve

Yes, weight reduction and an increase of strength that is gained from the pieced being stamped. When spot-welded together with the front portion which is also stamped into shape, the assembly becomes very rigid but light. I don't think there is any problem fixing it the way described if you aren't looking for total originality. In that case I might even be tempted to just cut, notch, bend and weld up a piece of thin walled square tubing.

Edited by geezer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

my 260's was full of rust, so i removed the whole inner portion.I've since made a replacement with round holes, i just turned up a simple press tool on a lathe at work.I havent fitted it as yet so i can send photo's if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.