Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

How many HORSEPOWER vroom roooom!


skunkbud280Z

Recommended Posts

Okay I know this has been brought up and discussed before and I read the old threads and talked to different sources through the years and I'm as confused as ever.

Let me see if I can put some supposed puzzle pieces down that I've heard about regarding 280Z's horsepower (and generally all the classic Zs).

1975 the 280Z came out. Sources speak of the engine having 149 HP. Okay. 1976 some online sources don't speak of anything different with the engine. I have a metal plate under the hood that says 170 HP. I was talking to the owner of one Z shop locally and he was saying "oh yeah we can completely rebuild your engine brand new to 200+HP for xxxx dollars". Another owner of another Z shop laughed and said "there's no way that engine is going to produce 200-220 HP and still be pleasant streetable". I retorted "Oh c'mon, my engine has 170 HP already!" And he replied back "That engine does NOT have 170 HP!"

So, Nissan was pulling a fast one here (no pun intended)? They're using a different unit of measure that happens to share the same name? Samurai, like vikings, ride hobby horses? Or WTH is going on?

Then I read on a lot of online sources that in 1977 280Z's HP is upped to 170. I also saw a sticker that still says it has 170 HP, just like mine. Then based on the discussions here and elsewhere, I read that the HP difference between these 280Z cars is non-existent and they're all the same or about the same???!

I found this information in another forum which seems realistic, mentioning an old convention for measuring HP vs. the new convention for measuring it:

BHP- Brake HP measured at flywheel

HP- 1BHP=.986HP so for most cars the difference would only be off by 1, also measured at flywheel

Gross HP- old way, HP of motor only-no accesories and out of car, also measured at flywheel.

http://www.zcar.com/forums/read/2/854050

But is this right?

So how much HP does a '76 really have? A '77 really have? A '70 really have 150? 151? A '74 really have 139? Etc.

To add more dizziness to the discussion, an old friend was telling me the virtues and drawbacks of mounting weber carbs onto my L28: Sounds mean, FAST, difficulties starting, etc. How much of a HP boost would this move make? If I keep the EFI and just go for different options on a rebuild, what gains would we realistically be talking about here? Any good bang for the buck wisdom from any of you fellow Z-heads?

I'd rather keep my original engine and EFI than install a V8 so am more interested in L28 EFI alternatives. I don't want to stifle the discussion though. Hearing someone's V8 stories would be fun too. I saw a 240Z on youtube with a big V8 in it, and when he got on the gas, the car wanted to lurch right out of its lane (TOO much engine as he said). I hate people who do burnouts and donuts in their Z. Doesn't impress me. I like to see cars vault ahead with smooth efficient power without losing any of their handling characteristics also. And original engines = greater worth, in theory.

Here's that youtube video I was referring to:

Supercharged V8 as it turns out. It looks like he's about to veer into oncoming traffic at one point. I also suspect those wheels, beautiful as they are, might be doing some rubbing there. Anyway...different strokes for different folks I suppose. If I had a 240Z I'd definitely want the original 2.4L in it.

Edited by skunkbud280Z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't think to use Wiki for some reason.

So all these fabled cars I always gawked over like the '69 Hurst/Olds with their ~400HP ratings were pared back a great deal due to how they measured horsepower differently.

Still doesn't explain the extra 21 HP like you said. Could Nissan have reverted back to Gross Horsepower in 1976, where they hadn't done so in prior years? Or were they always using GrossHP in those prior years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You lose about 20% or so from the fly to the wheels so.... My stock s14 silvia engine rated by Nissan as 220hp was dynoed at 186 to the wheels.

I saw them dyno a mid 90's mustang GT on one of those spike tv shows and it put down 160 at the wheels. Don't you know mustang GT owners all over were severely let down by that. No wonder my 510 can walk all over the mustang GT's from the 80's-90's :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You lose about 20% or so from the fly to the wheels so.... My stock s14 silvia engine rated by Nissan as 220hp was dynoed at 186 to the wheels.

I saw them dyno a mid 90's mustang GT on one of those spike tv shows and it put down 160 at the wheels. Don't you know mustang GT owners all over were severely let down by that. No wonder my 510 can walk all over the mustang GT's from the 80's-90's :)

It's funny that people can be happy with the performance of their cars then get all sad when it doesn't dyno out at what they thought. Dynos are for tuning not for "racing".

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny that people can be happy with the performance of their cars then get all sad when it doesn't dyno out at what they thought. Dynos are for tuning not for "racing".

Steve

Thats true, but theres a simple recipe to that solution, add more Gas

and add more Air. LOL

I also like the sound of the L24, nothing beats a tri carb.

~Z~

Edited by WingZr0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

suggests that the only change made between 1975 and 1976 was that the ammeter was changed to a voltmeter. And it lists the 1975 engine at 149 HP. It doesn't explicitly state that the power was increased in 1977 but it strongly implies it if you take the wording as it sounds.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/nissan-z-history3.htm

What I'm curious about, if anyone has a 1975 280Z, is what does your plaque under your hood say regarding your engine's HP?

If Nissan didn't raise power to 170 till 1977, why does it say that on our cars? If they raised it in 1976 then Howstuffworks is wrong, as is another website I visited (don't remember which one).

And if there is a 21HP difference between any of these 280s, WHAT made the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.