Difference between a Sportscar and a Performance Sedan

[sblake01]

Whatever you say; it's your thread so I guess you can supply the definitions.

The 'willy-nilly' emoticon:

See ya!

Edited September 7, 2009 by sblake01

[Mikes Z car]

I think of the Z as an art form in styling.

[Oiluj]

First, I'm in my mid 50's, so my perspective may be a bit skewed...

That said, I fully agree with the definition of a "sportscar" as being a two seat convertible or GT.

I think the Corvette is certainly a sports car, but agree with the opinion that sport sedans are a different class.

Back in the day, BMW 2002's and 510's were not considered sports cars, and I think that definition still applies. I say this with full knowledge that many sport sedans like the WRX and EVO will outperform many contempary "sports cars".

Just my 2 cents...

They don'r need a lot of HP, but they do need to handle well

[TomoHawk]

The Mini Cooper will fit for you then, Julio. It doesn't have much horsepower, but does handle well. It has little in terms of amenities, but was very enjoyable.

[TomoHawk]

There is a nice article on the Wikipedia website concernin sportscars, and the differences between sportscars and other associated types.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car

[Oiluj]

The wikipedia sports car write-up was an interesting read. Thanks for that.

I've driven an original Mini Cooper as well as the current incarnation. I consider them "fun" sport sedans that feel like a street legal go-cart.

[FastWoman]

It seems this is a purists' question, and the criteria only serve to exclude others from the club. Can't we cast a broad net and say that sports cars are used for competition driving, whether on a curvy course, a drag strip, or in the mud?

Dunno, maybe the bar could be set higher: A *real* sportscar has only one seat and no doors.

Edited September 8, 2009 by FastWoman