Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Crack in the Body


tickhead

Recommended Posts

I am about to purchase a '77 or '78 Z. I've seen a few in person that had cracks along the roof rail just as the rail leave the roof along the hatchback. What causes this and should I be wary? Also, where is the C-Clip located? I know about the floor pan and frame rail rust issue. Are there other structural issues I need to keep in mind before my purchase?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monster power can do that, but a stiff suspension combined with years of fatigue and or rust, can cause the paint to crack in that area. It is a factory body seam that can crack. Although it is often just paint or sub-filler crack. It is very common, and usually not a huge deal. It's not a fatal sign by any means. Look closely for rust elsewhere.

C-Clip? I only know of a handful of C-clips on a Z car. Shifter, throttle linkage, brake linkage, clutch linkage maybe, and a few other places, if that is what you are asking.

Again, RUST, RUST, RUST, and it can be hidden very well, so look deep. A little bit of rust, the size of a dime, on the lower portions of the car, is often the tip of a large iceberg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My car had a crack on the drivers side when I purchased it. After carefully sanding it down (the seam is filled with a lead bead on early cars, not sure about later S30s) my body guy cleaned and filled the seam with body sealer during prep work. The crack is starting to re-appear. I just spent over 7 grand getting the car painted and would like to resolve this.

I do have a rear anti-sway bar. Could that contribute to the cracking during hard cornering?

Sorry about the hijack but although it may not be a big deal you should know that the crack may come back even after it is "fixed".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like what you are referring to is the body seam where the roof is connected. From the factory it was sealed with lead before painting. Normal body flex and vibration can cause the small cracks over time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my body guy cleaned and filled the seam with body sealer during prep work. The crack is starting to re-appear.

Body sealer does not a mechanical joint make.

If there is panel flex happening, that needs to be remedied before any cosmetic is applied.

A few tiny tack welds along the seam THEN a body filler.

If you have any recourse with your body man I'd take it up:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Body-flexing is causing that joint covering compound to crack. That body flexing, as mentioned, can be due to excessive horsepower for the car, or spirited driving over uneven surfaces at speed.

However, it may also be due to another set of spot welds elsewhere in the car having given way and therefore allowing that part of the car to flex more than it should. It should be noted however, that this particular joint is a known problem site.

Additionally, repairs to other parts of the car, being done without proper support of the main body can cause this same situation. A complete rocker panel replacement, floor pan removal and re-installation, are but two that come to mind.

But, as Graeme points out, Seam Sealer, caulking, even Bondo or spot fiberglass are NOT a substitute for a proper mechanical joint. The lead cracked due to the flex in the joint, and lead is used both for it's hardness AND it's malleability (i.e. flex), but excessive flexing is what caused it to fail (whether due to range or cyclic flexing).

FWIW

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thought I would add a few illustrations to further define the problem and support what has been said.

My personal take on this problem, would point to a body design problem that was bound to show up sooner or later, depending on the individual cars usage, as well as the combined effects of time induced metal fatigue and the very likely (in many cases), rust corrosion which weakens the lower unibody structure, thereby putting an increased amount of stress on the roof support and quarter panel seam. It is not stout enough to carry the weight or flexing forces exerted at this point after weakening of the lower shell has occurred. Steps must be taken to strengthen the shell in its entirety to relieve the destructive flexing at this joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.