Very Nice '67 Datsun 2000 Roadster

[lonetreesteve]

I never knew that Roadsters in this condition were worth this kind of money! Here's the link:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150552881587

Edited January 28, 2011 by lonetreesteve
misspelled word

[d240zx2]

That one IS a beauty, isn't it?

[SportBikeMike]

Wow, I had no idea they were worth that kind of money either. Great-looking car.

[motorman7]

1967 1/2 , 2000 Roadsters are the prize of the roadster releases. Low production rate...and beautiful cars.

[cygnusx1]

Hmm makes me want to go buy a decent 260Z.

[Montezuma]

Wow roadster are very valuable.

[Mike B]

I imagine the full restoration by CDM helps justify the price too.

-Mike

[ajmcforester]

OK someone is asking to much 31,000 and still below reserve. It's a nice car and I would love it if I fit, never been in one and over 6'4". The car is worth about 35,000 at most from what I see maybe sine their is a lot of bidding it might go for more.

[Bruce Palmer]

Roadsters are a monumental undertaking price wise. Parts are very spendy and always have been. So if you see a done roadster with a high price tag, it's because someone has already done the "meltdown" doing it.

[Unkle]

This car looks mint but it just lacks the style and performance for me .

This car is worthy of '' BaT '' comments though ( "Bring a trailer" ) !

$31000 + ? I'd rather go for a Pantera maybe......

[Oiluj]

This car looks mint but it just lacks the style and performance for me .

You might be surprised by the performance of a strong 2000 roadster. Have no data or numbers, but took a ride in one a while back. My "seat-of-the-pants" evaluation is that acceleration and cornering felt similar to a strong 240Z, maybe even a bit better.

That is one nice looking roadster!

[Bruce Palmer]

Yeh 2 liters are strong runners. However, a friend of ours here lunched a timing chain on his going to Shasta several years ago and parts alone were $850 to him and he's in the parts biz.