Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Engine Balancing?


Ed

Recommended Posts

I've got a F54 that is ready to put back together. I had the opportunity to weigh the piston/rods the other day and decided, why not. I weighed the piston, rod, cap, bearings & bolts as an assembly. The heaviest was 2 lbs 14.15 oz. and the lightest was 2lbs 13.95 oz. is this difference big enough to have the engine balanced. I was just going to put it all together and not give balancing a second thought but after seeing this??????

What do you guys think? I'm not planning anything drastic with this engine 6k rev limit N/A. Street use. Should I get it balanced?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't if it's just going to be a street engine. Unless you just want to play around with a die grinder....:cross-eye

Truthfully, that probably is pretty good for a mass produced engine and parts. That little weight difference over 6 is pretty darn close if you asked me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2ManyZs,

I Agree. Part of my job as a vintage racing engine builder, is balancing. I just figured this up in my noggin, but I think Im close.

His difference is only .2 oz. One oz. is 28 grams. So .2 oz. is about 5.5 grams. Race engines require a tolerance of plus or minus .5 grams for each component. So for a streeter, thats only

plus or minus 2.75 grams. Actually thats darn good. FWIW.

Phred

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a "shadetree" mechanic at best, I didn't break it down into grams like Phred did. But thinking about it, I'd say this is quite amazing to see an engine with 70's or 80's technology coming out this closely.

Today's engine are built on an assembly line as well, but because of the compression ratios used, and the temps today's engine operate at for emissions controls etc. the tolerances they are built to would be hard to beat. With today's CNC machines and such making the basic assemblies, they are probably even closer than this. But that's what makes this one stand out. They didn't use CNC machinery like they do now to make their basic assemblies like pistons, pins, rods, etc. They were probably still using just an investment cast part.

Good job Nissan....:geek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.