L-Series engine timeline

[EuroDat]

Hi all,

I have been playing with a table listing "all" the variations of the L-series engine in the S30 and S130 model range. I started it for myself to try and get a better understanding of when and what changed.

The table (Timeline) is by no means complete. If anyone has any information or finds any errors I would like to hear it. Up to now its just information I have read in forums of manuals over the years. Now Im trying to fill the gaps.

It looks like geezer tried to make a similar Timeline before. Im want to try and do the engine, thats a big enough undertaking.

http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/zcar-history-forum/24478-timeline-chart.html

Thanks for any help.

L-Engine Timeline.pdf

Edited February 27, 2013 by EuroDat

[siteunseen]

I got no help/info but I like what your doing and can't wait to print out the finished timeline.

[JLPurcell]

Great information, sorry I can't help.

jlp

[Captain Obvious]

Great stuff. I wish I had seen that before I bought I bought the wrong engine...

Might want to note that the later N47 heads are a little different than the earlier ones. I don't profess to know all of the changes, but one thing I can absolutely confirm is a threaded sensor hole into the water jacket back between spark plugs 5&6.

And where does the W48 exhaust manifold fall in that progression?

Edited February 28, 2013 by Captain Obvious

[Zed Head]

Exhaust manifold info would be good. Square port N42, round port N47. I think that the exhaust manifolds used in the ZX cars are different from those used in the Z's also, and they also have a round port for the P79 head and a square port for the P90(A). The bolt patterns are the same but the ZX manifold is shorter from top to exhaust pipe flange (can't use the ZX manifold on my Z with a stock Z exhaust pipe). I just measured them the other day, but one was on an engine. The ZX manifolds also have an O2 sensor port.

And the N47 head came in the middle of 77, I believe, July maybe. And the F54/P79 came in late 80. I could be wrong on the N47, pretty sure I'm right on the F54/P79.

Also my 76 N42 exhaust manifold has an EGR port. I think that the CA models might have had EGR. The Service Bulletin says they all do, but it's not right. The picture has it right though. The xenons30 site has the 1976 Service Bulletin and various Owners Manuals.

Looks like a cool resource when it's done, thanks for putting it out here.

p.s. The valve seats should be silicon, not silicone. Tiny detail. And, I don't know the fine details, but in the 1976 TSB page 8, it says that the intake valve seat material was changed to something more durable but they don't say what. Maybe the change happened in late 76. I think that TSB's come out after the model is introduced.

Groovy~

Edit - Just saw CO's post. I thnk that the N47 head with the CHTS port is actually the (in)famous Maxima N47 head. Used on the Maxima L24E. Smaller combustion chamber and valves.

Edited February 28, 2013 by Zed Head

[madkaw]

It would be nice to see more precise info regarding the cylinder heads. The main issue would be the E-88 generation heads, since there was at least 3 versions.

Example is my 9/71 E-88 had the smaller chamber size of of the E-31.

Why? For folks looking for a certain CC chamber size for their build.

[madkaw]

I will say that the graph seems pretty accurate -well done. Looking at the heads again, you do show progressions in the e-88 head. Not sure how you can show the e-88 and e-31 sharing the same combustion chamber for a short period of time.

[EuroDat]

Thanks for the feedback. Plenty of info on the heads. I didnt know there are 3 versions of the E88 or 2 of the N47 for that matter. The Z is always amazing me. You think you know a lot and then you realise you dont know that much after all.

I will include a line for exhaust manifolds, but dont know where the W48 fits in?

My goal is to make a chart we can all use for searching and matching parts and post it in the technical articles.

Ill post an update tonight (CET).

[HS30-H]

I will say that the graph seems pretty accurate -well done.

Except that it completely ignores the Japanese market L20A and L20AE-engined models.

Speechless.....

[madkaw]

accurate to my limited knowledge:)

Except that it completely ignores the Japanese market L20A and L20AE-engined models.

Speechless.....

[HS30-H]

My goal is to make a chart we can all use for searching and matching parts and post it in the technical articles.

Ill post an update tonight (CET).

EuroDat,

How are you going to address the fact that there was no simple, linear time-line style breakdown for the engines fitted in different models and in different markets?

You're going to need to think about this again before you design your layout. I'm disappointed to see you ignoring the Japanese market models of a Japanese car ( you don't seem to have even thought of them...? ) but it's even more disappointing to see somebody from the Netherlands ignore the European market versions too ( look at your '260Z' data.... ).

It's a big task you're taking on, and hats off to you for trying, but it's got to be RIGHT or there's no point. There are already more inaccurate data sources out there than you can shake a stick at, and we don't need any more poisoned wells.

Sorry to be harsh, but I think it needs to be said.

[geezer]

I can appreciate the amount of effort that you have put into the creation of this chart but as Alan has pointed out, in order to be complete, and to cover all model designates another approach would need to be taken. A true timeline illustrating the S30 would also be more accurate using the VIN or month of build as a time marker. It would seem that targeting only the engines would make for a simplified chart but even so the components to build the engines are selected for various reasons, such as mandates dictated to conform to emission standards of the particular market designation or any number of other reasons specified by the particular market. Having said that, I do like the idea of laying it out in this manner but only if labeled with the corect market designations that are applicable. In no way am I trying to discourage you from going ahead, just pointing out the bigger picture that will present problems and poke holes in the method you are using. Good luck!