Unkle Posted March 16, 2014 Share #13 Posted March 16, 2014 I know what the lawsuit is about! These people were in accidents where the airbag did not deploy because of a faulty ignition switch. I've seen people with 5 lbs of stuff on their key rings. How much weight do you think these should be designed to handle? '' because of a faulty ignition switch '' ??????? These switches are being turned enough by heavy key rings being jostled , thus disabling the airbag , or turning the engine off in vulnerable situations . I don't understand what you are trying to point out here ? Are you saying I'm wrong ? To me it's not just the switch , it's the driver more so . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Head Posted March 16, 2014 Share #14 Posted March 16, 2014 There are probably millions or billions of other cars that aren't affected by heavy key rings. That's how the problem would be defined, probably the same in a court of law. Cars are so common that there are a defined set of expectations. Apparently, these cars don't behave as expected. Now if they put a warning label on the dashboard and people ignore it then they could claim consumer fault. If they knew people with heavy key rings had problems and did nothing then it's the producer's fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Moore Posted March 16, 2014 Share #15 Posted March 16, 2014 303 out of how many millions sold?There weren't very many people killed in the "exploding" Ford Pintos either. In fact the one lawsuit that set the whole Pinto recall in motion involved a drunk driver traveling over 80 mph who rear-ended a car that was stopped at a red light. That doesn't change the fact that the car was intrinsically unsafe. It takes a pretty specific, and unusual, series of events for a faulty ignition switch to cause a fatal wreck.As for the original question: A large percentage of G.M. sales are driven by employee and supplier discounts. Retirees and their immediate families can continue to use the employee discount for the rest of their life. When you factor that discount into the picture it can make a G.M. much cheaper than the alternatives. The way that system is structured there could be 5 to 10 people eligible for an employee discount per current/retired G.M. employee. That market alone keeps the wheels greased so to speak.(Some years G.M. gives retirees discount deals specifically intended to be given to their friends, etc.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike W Posted March 17, 2014 Share #16 Posted March 17, 2014 This is the best reason I can think of.................. Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Head Posted March 23, 2014 Share #17 Posted March 23, 2014 Executive level fraud has gone on for ages, so no comment on the following link. I just thought it fit the thread topic.U.S. eyes bankruptcy link in GM ignition defect probe: report | Reuters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Head Posted March 31, 2014 Share #18 Posted March 31, 2014 The web (of deception) gets better-defined:A Florida engineer cracks ignition flaw GM kept hidden | Nation & World | The Seattle Times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurbycar32 Posted March 31, 2014 Share #19 Posted March 31, 2014 Half of my Fathers family still works for GM, most of them are laid off half of the year or more. I get a ridiculous discount on GM cars but theres a Dodge/cummins and a Mazda 3 out front, Z in the garage. I wouldn't buy a GM ever. Build quality sucks top to bottom in comparison to most of their competitors. The Corvette might be the only exception, but for the money I would rather have a Porsche, even if it were slower. Im not saying they dont make a decent vehicle, but in every category theres a better option for the same price or better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Coffey Posted April 1, 2014 Share #20 Posted April 1, 2014 The "heavy key ring" thing is misdirection. If you read the NHTSA reports the ignition switches will shut off with only the original key in place. Happened 65 times as the cars were driven off the factory assembly line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zed Head Posted April 1, 2014 Share #21 Posted April 1, 2014 Thanks for that reference. The latest NHTSA recall report though, blames it on the the keys. Do you have something from earlier? The general situation has the look of everyone trying to cover their asses, including the government watch-dog. Pretty sad.Recalls & Defects | National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchResults?searchType=ID&targetCategory=R&searchCriteria.nhtsa_ids=14V047000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Coffey Posted April 1, 2014 Share #22 Posted April 1, 2014 From the first recall notice:" In these models, the weight on the key ring and/or road conditions or some other jarring event may cause the ignition switch to move out of the run position, turning off the engine."GM engineers noticed the problem during normal road testing back in the early 2000s when only the key was in the ignition. Adding any weight to the key ring (including the stock alarm fob) exacerbates the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280z Posted April 20, 2014 Author Share #23 Posted April 20, 2014 GM is evil... can't say anything but. They are trying to weasel out of being responsible AND sending more money off-shore to China (see links below).UN-AMERICANI paid taxes in both USA and Canada when both Govts gave this evil company over $60Billion (49.5USA 10.8CAN)in loans and they did not pay it all back (USA owed 10.5B and CAN 8B).DON'T BUY GMGM seeks bankruptcy ruling on its product liability protection | Detroit Free Press | freep.comGM to invest $12 billion in China and plans more plants | Reuters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280z Posted June 5, 2014 Author Share #24 Posted June 5, 2014 Finally a leader with guts: GM recall probe prompts executive departures - Jun. 5, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now