Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

1976 280Z Restoration Project


wheee!

Recommended Posts


And before anyone starts saying “but those are 280 shafts....!”

I pulled apart a 240 shaft I had laying around (yea it’s a 240 cuz the stub shaft is attached and the spline count is for a 240...) and they are the same as the 280 ones.

The 240 shaft with u joint still attached on top.

IMG_8680.thumb.jpg.d0983c7112e1fbdacd7c17dd9e807fc6.jpg

IMG_8681.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Coffey had a nice writeup about this on his old Beta Motorsports web page.  He even transferred it over to the Facebook of his new company when he shut Beta down.  They compared a whole bunch of shafts to show that they're all the same length.

The only reason for binding then is if there's less space between the hubs of a 240Z versus a 280Z.  The 240Z hubs, actually the distance between the flanges, would actually have to thicker since the wheel bases are the same.  That's the number that is still unclear.

So, comparing the flange to flange distance of a 240Z rear axle to a 280Z rear axle might show something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.