Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Specifically Affecting Ca Residents, Please Read


rcb280z

Recommended Posts

As a California resident for over two decades, it baffles me how the state's priorities are so out of whack.  Gov. Brown wants to build a high-speed rail that is so over budget, it cannot turn a profit, let along make the promised time between LA to SFO of 2 hrs and 40 mins.  Now impose another fee on a small minority of vehicles that shrinks as attrition and time takes it toll.

 

The biggest problem facing the state is water, not going after old automobiles.

Edited by DatsunZGuy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the same question I have had for years Charles. If I could update my FI with a programmable system not only will my Z run better but it would run "cleaner". We should be allowed to do this to our vehicles. 

 

Not to mention, Ed, that the state is supposedly broke. Don't get me wrong, I love where I live, next to the beach. And I like clean air. I believe in doing my part so let me do my part and update my fuel system to a better one and not penalize me for it. Thats all I'm trying to say.

Edited by rcb280z
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you can't alter the system to improve emmisions is really hard to understand. I would have more trouble with that than the $200. Seems like they are using the emmisions as a way to get older cars of the road, which doesn't fit with the pre 1976 exemption to the rule.

Im lucky in that area. We can do what we want to the engine as long as you don't increase capacity, like install a V8 etc.

Chas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found what appears to be actual text and pasted it below.  in the case of your mostly well running 280z this would work, but its not smog exemption per-se.  The vehicle owner would have to make "necessary" emissions related repairs, which does not appear to have a spending cap.  it might be an extreme example but the smog referee could say to go get your pistons replaced first..  I also don't see how this would protect a motor swap situation

 

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_0501-0550/ab_550_bill_20150326_amended_asm_v98.html

 

SECTION 1. Section 44011.7 is added to the
Health and Safety Code , to read:
44011.7. (a) The owner of a motor vehicle that is required to
obtain a certificate of compliance pursuant to Section 44011 may
elect to pay a smog abatement fee of two hundred dollars ($200) if
the motor vehicle meets all of the following criteria:
(1) Is 30 or more model-years old.
(2) Was manufactured during or after the 1976 model-year.
(3) Fails a smog test required pursuant to this chapter.
(4) Fails a subsequent smog test after necessary repairs were
made.
(B) Payment of the smog abatement fee established pursuant to this
section shall be made to the Department of Motor Vehicles at the
time of the registration of the motor vehicle.
© Fees collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited in
the Air Quality Improvement Fund created by Section 44274.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1976 still seems to be the "magic" year for SMOG awareness. There was a time when my 1963 Studebaker Avanti had to have seals placed on the carb adjusting screws after it received an "official" adjustment to the standards 40 years ago. Woe be to me of I broke the wax like seals that filled the screwdriver slot on each screw. Glad those days are gone. Twenty years ago, my '70 Porsche was the SMOG demon. It ran clean enough to pass the exhaust test, but couldn't pass the visual test due to aftermarket carbs and linkage. I ended up putting Historic plates on it which took it out of the SMOG test cycle and enabled me to drive it.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a time when my 1963 Studebaker Avanti had to have seals placed on the carb adjusting screws after it received an "official" adjustment to the standards 40 years ago. Woe be to me of I broke the wax like seals that filled the screwdriver slot on each screw. Glad those days are gone. 

 

My 2005 Yamaha dirt bike had brass plates blocking off access to the carb main jet that I had to actually drill out.  With CA gas being so terrible I had to drill that out just to unclog the jets within the first 60 days of ownership

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As a California resident for over two decades, it baffles me how the state's priorities are so out of whack.  Gov. Brown wants to build a high-speed rail that is so over budget, it cannot turn a profit, let along make the promised time between LA to SFO of 2 hrs and 40 mins.  Now impose another fee on a small minority of vehicles that shrinks as attrition and time takes it toll.

 

The biggest problem facing the state is water, not going after old automobiles.

 

Mind boggling...and this coming from a guy that lives in NJ. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 453 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.