blodi Posted September 22, 2017 Author Share #133 Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) Ok, electrical issue sorted (bad alternator) and back at it. Did a log tonight here...hot and humid out......165/230 92117 by blodi, on Flickr 155/225 still seems best...might start there again and then start testing the e tubes. Edited September 22, 2017 by blodi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280 Posted September 22, 2017 Share #134 Posted September 22, 2017 Glad you are sorted. Yes that run looks nice but as you say 0.5 point leaner will be nicer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280 Posted September 22, 2017 Share #135 Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) I did a comparison and the newest data (green) now looks normal across the rpm range. The160/230 (pink) run seems anomalous with the big hump in the middle and may not be valid. The data also shows that the 225 and 230 air correctors are too close to make a difference. I am now thinking the drilled 238 may be flowing more than a "manufactured 238". So a 235 or 240 air corrector may flatten the curve. Removing the pink data gives: Edited September 22, 2017 by 240260280 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280 Posted September 22, 2017 Share #136 Posted September 22, 2017 Could you please try the 160/230 again to rule out the anomalous data? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 25, 2017 Author Share #137 Posted September 25, 2017 Will do. I'll pop it back in tonight. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share #138 Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) Ok......160/230 again....much more inline with what we would expect....maybe overlay this with the 155/225 and see which we think is the better baseline to begin e-tube testing...... 92617 by blodi, on Flickr Edited September 27, 2017 by blodi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280 Posted September 27, 2017 Share #139 Posted September 27, 2017 The data seems to scale correctly now but the air is not doing enough to raise the top end and flatten the curve. I think a manufactured 240 air with 165 fuel is needed. The 160/230 is the best combo so far. Please keep the 160/230 and give the new E-tubes a spin! (Let the fun begin! ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share #140 Posted September 27, 2017 (edited) F11's are in! Took a log this morning on the way into work. I'll get another one on the way home and upload tonight. But on watching the gauge it seems much richer throughout...though maybe flatter? F16 vs F11.... Untitled by blodi, on Flickr Edited September 27, 2017 by blodi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share #141 Posted September 27, 2017 F11's with the 160/230 combo 92717 by blodi, on Flickr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 28, 2017 Author Share #142 Posted September 28, 2017 Also, I went ahead and installed the F2's tonight. So, I'll have that data tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blodi Posted September 28, 2017 Author Share #143 Posted September 28, 2017 F2's look mighty rich during the pull I did this morning. Logs tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
240260280 Posted September 29, 2017 Share #144 Posted September 29, 2017 F11 is slightly flatter but richer overall. F2 will be interesting. I am traveling and will post plots Friday evening. Great work to collect so fast. I am impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now