By July of 1970, the Nissan Factory Team had entered the 432R in four significant* endurance races. They did very well at quickly reaching number one place in a short period of time: 

January All Japan Suzuka 300Km              (dnf) [it snowed too]
March    All Japan Stock Car Fuji 300Km    (2nd)
April       Race de Nippon Fuji  6hrs            (1st)
May       All Japan Suzuka 1000km             (1st)

1970 All Japan Suzuka 300km (Jan 18, 1970)
Car #68 Fairlady Z432R  Moto KITANO (dnf)

 

 

 

1970 All Japan Stock Car (March 21/22, 1970) Fuji 300Km 
Car #20 Fairlady Z432 24 laps Time 39: 36.16   Moto KITANO  (2nd)
Car #16 Fairlady Z432 24 laps Time 39: 36.43   Masahiro HASEMI (3rd)

 

 

1970 Race de Nippon (April 12, 1970) 959km
Car #1 Fairlady Z432R 159 laps Moto KITANO / Masahiro HASEMI (1st)

 

 

1970 All Japan Suzuka 1000km (May 23/24, 1970)
Car #19 Fairlady Z432R 167 laps Hiromi NISHINO / KOJI FUJITA  (1st)

 

 

The next significant race was on July 25 and 26th. It was the All Japan Fuji 1000km Race. 

 

 

 

104 teams battled for the 50 slots available for the final 1000km event on July 26th.

By this time the Nissan works team had several 432R's configured and other teams had access to the 432R. A total of seven 432R's qualified for the final in the GTS-2 category.

This race was particularly interesting as the GTS-2 rules enabled engine displacements up to 2.5 litres.  The Nissan Oppama Factory Team availed of this. In one of the 432R chassis, they replaced the S20 DOHC 2.0 litre engine with a 240z's L24 SOHC 2.4 litre.  The S20's were further embellished with mechanical fuel injection where as the L24 had triple Mikuni carbs.

Due to the fact that all the bodies were the same lightened spec of the 432R, this race became an apples-to-apples engine comparison where a more sophisticated and complex, but smaller displacement, 4 valve, DOHC S20 was pitted against  a relatively simple 2 valve SOHC L24 with more displacement.... but it was six against one.

As they say in the USA: "K.I.S.S. Keep It Simple Stupid." and "There ain't no replacement for displacement.".

Above is the L24 with Triple Mikunis that challenged Six S20's in the very early days of S30 racing.

The 1000km race took place during a heat wave with air temperature at 30C (look at the crowd sheltering from the sun in the upper grand stands in the photo above).

The race ended after the first car completed the required 1,000km (233 laps).

 

The seven 432R's starting places were:

1. Car #32   Pole Position                    (Kenji TOHIRA & Takatoshi TERANISHI)
2. Car #30   2nd                                  (Yasumori TOSHIMORI & Kazuyoshi HOSHINO)
3. Car #31   5th  (with L24 engine)     (Takahashi KUNIMITSU & Motoharu KUROSAWA)
4. Car #28   6th                                   (Saburo KOINUMA & Takamichi SHINOHARA)
5. Car #34   7th                                   (Masami KUWASHIMA & Kenji TAKAHASHI)
6. Car #37 15th                                   (Minoru SATO & Kazuo ISHII)
7. Car #27 20th                                   (Isamu MIURA &)

 

The race had the classic "Le Mans" running start.

 

 

During the race, a GT-R in the TS class challenged the L24 432-R

There were also crashes. Car #27 crashed on lap 35.

Several spins:

Lots of exciting passing

    

 

 

And problems with lug nuts: While in the lead at 5 hours into the race, Car #31 had to repair a broken lug nut that was discovered on a scheduled pit stop. This allowed the GT-R Car #54 in TS3 Class, piloted by the great driver, Masahiro HASEMI, to grab the lead.

 

 

On Lap 225, the L24 powered 432-R reeled in the GT-R and passed it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

After 233 laps of the 4.3km course, the 432R with L24, Car #31, got the checkered flag. It won the race and it won the class. More interestingly, Takahashi KUNIMITSU and Motoharu KUROSAWA in their "Datsun Sports 240 Z HS 30" easily took on, and defeated, six similarly prepared 432R's with S20 engines.

 
Car #31 432R with L24 Engine Wins the All Japan Fuji 1000km Race. 

 

Motoharu KUROSAWA(l) and Takahashi KUNIMITSU (r)

 

 

The L24 in an effectively "lightened 240z chassis"**" finished two laps ahead of the nearest S20 432R competitor. The rest of the S20 432R's  finished 34, 95, 146, 198, 210 laps down.  The L24 had no competition. It was strong, reliable, and a race worthy engine that proved itself on its first outing in Japan. 

 

 

 

As an epilogue to the race, there was great disappointment for the S20 engine.  The All Japan Fuji 1000 km results were the writing on the wall for the relatively new S20 power plant.  Going forward, it was generally not favoured by racers in classes where the L24 could be used. In fact, the following year's 1971 Race de Nippon 6hr was won by a Factory 240z L24 piloted by Takahashi KUNIMITSU & Masahiro HASEMI. If you recall from the top of this post, this is the same race where, in April of 1970, the S20 432 alos piloted by Moto KITANO & Masahiro HASEMI captured its first win. The reign of the S20 was short indeed.

Masahiro HASEMI, the former great racer and team owner (who was the first to place first in the 432-R and who placed 11th with the fastest lap in the famous wet 1975 Japanese Grand Prix race at Fuji (Lauda withdraws, Hunt gets 3rd) ) states: that in having raced the Factory 432R's fitted with both S20 and L24 (as a Factory team driver for Nissan), it is the L24's mid-range torque that gives it the advantage when battling S20's. When going off the racing line, torque matters. With the experience as a team owner, he comments that the L24's simple design is easier to tune and to maintain for racing duties compared to the more complex S20. This is why privateers in Japan welcomed it with open arms following its first showing and first win at the 1970 All Japan Fuji 1000 km.

HASEMI also comments that he favoured the Skyline GT-R over the 432R. He found the 432R to be too flexible for circuit racing. Note: HASEMI piloted the GT-R in this race that placed second. This placed him first in his TS3 class.

 

A few interesting food-for-thought take-aways:

• The Japanese Automotive Federation, rigorous in its ways, records the winning chassis to be a "Datsun Sports 240z HS-30" (RHD version of the same chassis shipped to the USA) where as the other 6 Z's are stated to be Fairlady Z432 PS30.   So, was the winning Chassis really a 432R with an L24 popped in?  Also, was the 432 JAF record missing the "R"?
   
• The heavier 240z body exported to the USA was further race-strengthened there through stitch-welding, panel reinforcements, and bracing yet it still continued to win championships for a decade with the additional weight; therefore, was the designed weight savings of the 432R chassis variant along with the accompanying rigidity challenges,  lost in the mix?
   
• Is it possible the 432R body was designed for, or was just a better fit for rallying purposes rather than track?
   
• Notice the evolution to chin spoilers between May and July. I wonder what parallel evolution was going on in the USA?
   
• Should the winning L24 & Chassis be renamed from 432R to 231R?
   
• S20 engine seems to excel at high rpm, high speed, open track  qualifying as per HASEMI's comment that it works well on the racing line and by its favourable qualifying times.

 

 

 

* Other races include:

Photo TBD.
Jun 6/7 All Japan Fuji 300 Mile Race Tournament  Masami KUWASHIMA Car #4 Fairlady Z432 25 laps Time 56: 53.98   (1st)

 

Jul.5 6/7 Hokkaido Speedway  Yasumori SHINOMORI Car #3 Fairlady Z432-R (PS30SB) 57 laps Time 1:09'51"09 (3rd)

 

Jun 28 All-Japan Driver Championship Round 4 Tsukuba Tournament Masami KUWASHIMA Car #66 Fairlady Z432 50 laps Time 59: 23.56   (2nd)

 

** 432R chassis was of nearly same dimensions as 240z HS/HLS30 chassis but with thinner sheet metal in places and thicker gauge steel in areas and components requiring it. There were some replacements of parts such as the hood and some glass with lighter materials. It sat ~ 5mm higher than a typical 240z.

Edited January 17, 20178 yr by 240260280

The winning L24 and engine compartment seems pretty basic from the outside.  A few items to note:

• throttle linkage replaced by cable
• dead-headed fuel piping architecture
• oil cooler and fittings
• deleted mechanical fuel pump
• alternate PCV system with large white plastic catch can
• deleted fan
• non-stock damper pulley
• remote oil pressure measurement sensor
• fibreglass belly pan
• hood latch delete (racing pin arrangement)
• stock battery, alternator, distributor, radiator, coil, starter
• very light coloured distributor cap. Plugs seem stock.
• stock wiring harness
• unknown hose from battery area to drain on left tower/wheel well. It seems to go behind battery then across the fire wall to the transmission tunnel area.
• heater hose delete
• shortened/modified fuel rail
• stock-ish fuel filter
• Stock hood prop, vent elbows, rad over-flow drain hose, v-reg cover
• Washer fluid hoses in place along with stock wipers
• brake booster not in shot. Master brake cylinder and clutch master cylinder seems to be stock
• no camber mods to shock towers
• engine lift bracket in place

Edited January 14, 20178 yr by 240260280

Blue,

You continue to amaze!!

nice read....

So much for diamond rings and oil paintings

Looking over the engine compartment pic above... In addition to the stuff you mentioned, here's a couple things that caught my eye:

Special "racing tape" secure on the clutch and master cylinder caps.

Multiple piece upper radiator hose? Hose clamps in the middle?

Vent nipple on valve cover angled forward to adapt to different PCV system.

"OIL" cap. I thought the early ones were elephant?

Couple unharnessed wires up and over the left strut tower. Is that stock?

"D" shaped washers on some of the fender bolts for clearance into sheet metal corner.

Mystery solved on the  rad hose.  It is a 432 radiator and the top inlet is just right of centre. A HS-30 240z's inlet is well left of centre.

 

Edited January 15, 20178 yr by 240260280

Blue,

There are a great number of mistakes in your posts on this topic. Have you simply transcribed all this from another site, and have you used machine translations for Japanese names?

Or is this 'All Your Own Work'...?

9 hours ago, grannyknot said:

So much for diamond rings and oil paintings

Predicition: Values of diamond rings and oil paintings will most likely not drop through the floor just because somebody delivered a message telling you what you already should have known.

:rimshot:

17 hours ago, 240260280 said:

1. 

Takahashi Kokoh (l) and Motoharu Kurosawa(r)

 

Christ, what a mess. That's Motoharu KUROSAWA on the left, and Kunimitsu TAKAHASHI on the right.

This thread is going to be a real car crash. There are just so many mistakes and misunderstandings. Some really golden WTF moments.   

And Blue, what's the true purpose of this thread? You've titled it "L24 Battles Six S20s. Guess who wins?", but why? You seem to be framing it as a simplistic L24 vs S20 fight, but it wasn't actually anything as simplistic as that. What's your real agenda here?

The answer to the question posed by the thread title is, in fact, the latest Works car, with the 'ace' Works drivers behind the wheel...  . You might like to remind yourself that the car in question was still in fact a 432R, running all the 432R-specific homologated parts and having the benefit of all the factory team development carried out up to that point. The L24 being installed in that chassis was far (far!) from stock, with special Works-developed crank, rods, pistons, head and many other details, and was running at a displacement of over 2500cc (yes, 25% greater than the S20) allowed by the GTS-II class rules. You can hardly frame it as L24 = great, S20 = $^!#, can you?

Not only that, but I don't see any mention of one of the key points; The intra-company politics regarding the S20 engine and the fact that the very recently ex-Prince faction at Murayama regarded the S20 as 'their' engine and had effectively blocked the Nissan Works faction at Oppama from the better developments, updates and trick parts that the Murayama based team were using on their Skyline GT-R race cars. Murayama were not involved in racing the L6, so there was no potential for a reciprocal arrangement. Discussing the race career of the 432R without taking into account any of the Murayama/Oppama politics is to miss much of the point. 

And with regards specifically to the 1970 Fuji 1000kn race, you missed the elephant in the room for the whole event. Is that because you chose not to mention it, or because you didn't know about it? The big clue is what that particular event was supposed to be, and what cars were supposed to be taking part in it but for a recent tragedy. It had a huge impact on the race, and who/what won it.... It really ought to be taken into account.   

 

       

There are so many driver names that require correction, I'd better list them up:

Family name in capitals:

*"Kitano Yuan" = Moto KITANO

*"Masahiro Hasayami" = Masahiro HASEMI

*"Kenji Tsubairi" = Kenji TOHIRA

*"Teranishi Teranishi" = Takatoshi TERANISHI

*"Takahashi Kokoh" = Takahashi KUNIMITSU

*"Saburo Koumuma" = "Saburo KOINUMA

*"Ishii Kazuo" = Kazuo ISHII

*"Sakurai Ichi" = Hajime SAKURAI

19 hours ago, 240260280 said:

After 233 laps of the 4.3km course, the 432R with L24, Car #31, got the checkered flag. It won the race and it won the class. More interestingly, Takahashi Kokoh and Motoharu Kurosawa in their "Datsun Sports 240 Z HS 30" easily took on, and defeated, six similarly prepared 432R's with S20 engines.

The L24 "lightened 240z" finished two laps ahead of the nearest S20 432R competitor. The rest of the S20 432R's  finished 34, 95, 146, 198, 210 laps down.  The L24 had no competition. It was strong, reliable, and a race worthy engine that proved itself on its first outing in Japan. 

As an epilogue to the race, there was great disappointment for the S20 engine.  The All Japan Fuji 1000 km results were the writing on the wall for the relatively new S20 power plant.  Going forward, it was generally not favoured by racers in classes where the L24 could be used. In fact, the following year's 1971 Race de Nippon 6hr was won by a Factory 240z L24 piloted by Kunimitsu Takahashi & Masahiro Hasemi. If you recall from the top of this post, this is the same race where, in April of 1970, the S20 432 captured its first win. The reign of the S20 was short indeed.

 

(My bolded highlights)

A couple of questions: Who was/is calling that 432R a "lightened 240Z"? The car was entered as an HS30 '240Z' because that was the only way it could qualify for the GTS-II class rules. Putting a different engine in a PS30-prefixed body would have bumped the car up into the R-III class (where they didn't want to be) so they called it an HS30 and stayed in GTS-II.

You write: "The L24 had no competition". Had you mentioned any of the other competitors in the race, this might statement might start to look a little more tenuous. Yes they won the race, and that's what the Works team set out to do. However, there's some extra context here if you take into account the fact that pole position was taken by TOHIRA and TERANISHI in the #32 432-R (almost two seconds faster than TAKAHASHI and KUROSAWA in the L24-engined #31 hybrid, who took 5th fastest in qualifying) and they crashed out of the race early after being involved in somebody else's accident. The winning car was run close to the finish by the #54 PGC10 4-door Skyline GT-R of SUNAKO and HASEMI running in the TS-III class, who incidentally turned in a quicker fastest race lap than the winning car, which they had also outqualified. No competition...?

I think it's also worth pointing out that framing this event as being one L24-engined car vs six S20-engined 432-Rs is to take it hugely out of context, but that those six 432-Rs were not even equal amongst themselves. The two 'hot' Works-entered 432-Rs were the #32 car of TOHIRA and TERANISHI (which took pole, but was taken out by a non-fault crash) and the #30 car of TOSHIMORI and HOSHINO (which had taken second on the grid but ran into trouble during the race, which cost it a couple of laps). The other 432s and 432-Rs in the race were all privateer efforts in cars nowhere near the development/parts level of the Works cars. The KUWASHIMA / TAKAHASHI 432 was even running steel wheels! 

"As an epilogue to the race, there was great disappointment for the S20 engine". Huh?! Says who? In July 1970 - the date of the race you cite - Nissan's Murayama works team were already well on the way to record-breaking run of domination in the Japanese touring car championship, and in the middle of taking 40+ consecutive victories. They ended up with 50+ victories with S20-powered PGC10 and KPGC10 Skyline GT-Rs. Your statement is - in this context - complete nonsense and has the whiff of a pre-conceived agenda about it. I find it interesting that you would frame the victory for the L24 (it was an 'L24R' actually...) powered 432-R as some kind of disappointment? Why is that? Nissan's Oppama works team certainly didn't find it a disappointment. Why would they? It was - after all - their car and their engine...  

 

 

Anybody who is seriously interested in the topic of Japanese racing during this period would be well advised to dig a little more deeply than one issue of Auto Sport Japan's '200 Great Races' series for the full story. Big topic.