Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Picked up some brass rod..


Recommended Posts

CO I am a coward and will go the Dellorto Mikuni/Solex route at first.  No angled holes at first.

s-l1000.jpg            image.png

 

These will be true "E-Tubes" for "empirical" testing. 

Quick and dirty to understand the relation ships between hole locations and tube size.  Once this is mapped then angled holes will be tested.

I plan to make a drilling block that will have guide holes to consistently drill holes in the same location on all tubes.

I may even try to make a Mikuni solution that fits in a Weber's jet well as a second phase.  Some O rings may be all that is needed to keep the fuel in the tube. Have a look above at the tube on the right.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha! So the "E" stands for "empirical"! That's awesome! I never knew that!

Drilling that hole through the center isn't going to be a huge amount of fun either. Sounds simple, but probably won't be as simple as it sounds on paper. They use a special cutting edge geometry for brass that isn't as grabby. You'll know what I'm talking about the first time the bit grabs and spins your chuck in the tailstock.  :D 

You have a set of collets for the lathe? They lend themselves well to this kind of small, high accuracy work. It's nice to be able to work on one end, cut-off, and then spin the part around to work on the other end with pretty good accuracy using just a collet.

And your idea of making a block to help locate the holes is a good one. I do that kind of stuff all the time. I've got so many little special purposed fixtures around here that I've forgotten what some of the old ones were for!

I'm certainly no machinist, but you know how to reach me if you need a sympathetic ear!  :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Bad pun.

Back burnered for now.  We just tested F2,F11,F16,and F19 eTubes on the same car and the differences are not significant on 45DCOE carbs.

 

@blodi The predominant parameter is the tube diameter and it acts like the main jet by making the carb richer or leaner. F19 gave the best results but a non-tunable part of the a/f curve at the start of the main coming in seems to be due to exhaust tuning. It can probably be tuned with a "torque tuner" (A reflecting point added to the exhaust system). Here is how the same problem occurred on a bike and how it was resolved:

 

Look at how the torquetuner fixed the rich dip between 2500 and 4000 rpm.  It raised it from 12 to 13.

 

http://www.drdyno.com/AIM_2006-06.html

 

AIM_06-06_2.jpg

 

Here is the device: https://www.tabperformance.com/Reduce-Back-Pressure-Exhaust-s/203.htm

 

It would be needed in the header.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 1 Anonymous, 826 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.