April 18, 20186 yr comment_547598 Magnetic fields Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547598 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547599 Aside from the fact that it works how does that fix it? Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547599 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547600 Just now, SteveJ said: Magnetic fields Interesting. Thanks Steve. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547600 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547601 https://www.eeweb.com/tools/loop-inductance Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547601 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547610 That's a pretty cool fix, although it's not directly what Ian was implying, I think. I think he was trying to weaken the magnetic field by removing loops. You made it weaker by making it bigger, which you probably could have done with multiple loops too. Now that I see it again, I remember that that type of fix is out there on the internet, in various forums. But as I recall it, they were adding more loops. Anyway, why don't they just put that in their instructions? How many sale do they lose because of tach problems, I wonder? I'm surprised that Pertronix actually has a capable support person. A rarity in today's world. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547610 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547615 Well I've never held an early tach with my own two hands, so this is mostly engineering speculation, but I would go something like this... The early tachs ran the coil current to the tach. And (now that I've seen that picture), I would surmise that they used an inductive pickup for the tach to sense the ignition pulses. Just like the inductive pickup on your timing light. It senses current that flows through a wire, and just like your timing light, it does that by wrapping a "sensor" around the wire your interested in. Also the same as your clamp-on ammeter you use for house wiring to measure the current being drawn by your beer fridge. So that thing on the back of the tach is the inductive pickup, and the white wire running through it is the one being sensed. So now the real guessing starts... I'm guessing that the inductive pickup on the back of the tach is relatively cheap and prone to crosstalk and/or wave shape. I'm thinking that there may have been some crosstalk from the portion of the wire NOT looped through the sensor that was messing with the sensing of the wire that WAS looped trough the pickup. So by moving the loop of wire farther away from the pickup, it reduced the crosstalk or changed the wave shape just enough that the tach likes is better. Kinda hard to do that kind of analysis with no parts like that here though. Could be totally off, but until someone has something better...... Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547615 Share on other sites More sharing options...
April 18, 20186 yr comment_547617 Wow... Look at the time. I need to head to the beer fridge now! Mine draws 3.2 AAC. Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/59838-petronix-ignition-module/?&page=2#findComment-547617 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment