May 25, 20186 yr comment_549809 Ok, so I went and measured the car in the shop. The pinch welds on the bottom of the rocker panels appear to be parallel. It's a little hard to measure the front because the floor supports interfere with a straight measurement. The rear was easy and measures out at 51 1/4". The under floor pan frame rails are close to 30" outside to outside but get a little wider near the front of the floor board. I wonder if that is because there are more layers of metal there. For center line in the rear there seems to be a list of good candidates. Center of mustache bar bolts, center of control arm bolts, etc. All of these seem to be centered off of the wheel wells. The front is more difficult. I agree that everything forward of the firewall is suspect. I ended up concluding that the center of the hood latch bracket is a good candidate for a center line. It seems to measure very close to center from the top of the fender supports. If the hood latch is not centered anymore then you probably have bigger problems. Not much else there to work with... Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549809 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr comment_549816 Charles: Would you mind also measuring between the centre of the front shock towers, if convenient? FSM says 913mm. Interesting that your measurement of the pinchweld separation distance (51.25" = 1302mm) is smaller, rather than larger, than the 1326mm value I got from scaling off a screen blow-up the FSM diagram. The difference is almost exactly 1.0"... which makes me suspicious. Edited May 26, 20186 yr by Namerow comment added about FSM vs. actual dimensions Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549816 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr Author comment_549818 I appreciate all the help guys. I gotta work all weekend but on Monday I'm going to spend some time going over these numbers. Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549818 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr comment_549827 On 5/26/2018 at 1:45 AM, Namerow said: Charles: Would you mind also measuring between the centre of the front shock towers, if convenient? FSM says 913mm. Interesting that your measurement of the pinchweld separation distance (51.25" = 1302mm) is smaller, rather than larger, than the 1326mm value I got from scaling off a screen blow-up the FSM diagram. The difference is almost exactly 1.0"... which makes me suspicious. Yes I will try to get a center to center on the front shock towers. I measured inside to inside on the pinch welds. I will get an outside to outside and see if that is more in spec. It would make sense they would work on outside dimensions and leave the error for the inside. There are a number of metal layers there so the flange is fairly thick Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549827 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr comment_549829 Outside seam to outside seam is 51 9/16" or 1310mm Center to center on the front shock towers is 35 7/16" or 900 mm It looks like the FSM has 913 for this dimension. Will be interesting to see if my hood and fenders fit correctly when I set it off the rotisserie??? That's a pretty big "bust"! Edited May 26, 20186 yr by Patcon Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549829 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr comment_549830 C/C Shock towers on my '70 measured 905mm. Edited May 26, 20186 yr by CanTechZ Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549830 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr comment_549831 I did a hi-res scan of the FSM chassis drawing and then did a raster to vector conversion. For those who are interested, I am attaching the cad file (.dwg format) that most cad software should open, as well the same drawing as a pdf. I scaled the .dwg file as close as I could to 1:1. One thing I noticed was that when I scaled such that the horizontal dimensions were accurate the vertical dimensions were plus about 3%. See the dims in green that I added for reference. Mike 240Z Chassis Dimensions - Source 1972 FSM Dated 10SEP71_Scaled_26MAY2018.pdf 240Z Chassis Dimensions - Source 1972 FSM Dated 10SEP71_Scaled_26MAY2018.dwg Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549831 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 26, 20186 yr Author comment_549844 On 5/26/2018 at 4:59 PM, Patcon said: Outside seam to outside seam is 51 9/16" or 1310mm Center to center on the front shock towers is 35 7/16" or 900 mm It looks like the FSM has 913 for this dimension. Will be interesting to see if my hood and fenders fit correctly when I set it off the rotisserie??? That's a pretty big "bust"! My buddys car has the same 900mm as does mine and his hood fits beautiful. I would not sweat it . Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549844 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 27, 20186 yr Author comment_549854 Sweet! My lower pinch welds match up at 51 1/4 front and rear. I'm going to go with that for my front and rear centre reference lineSent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549854 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 27, 20186 yr comment_549857 On 5/27/2018 at 1:11 AM, Elliott000 said: Sweet! My lower pinch welds match up at 51 1/4 front and rear. I'm going to go with that for my front and rear centre reference line Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk That's fabulous! Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549857 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 27, 20186 yr Author comment_549876 Definitely nice knowing I have a dead to nuts center line. Tomorrow I'm going to triple check the car is level them plumb some points down and ensure everything up front is square at least within reason. Once I fi ish the driver side frame rail and tie a bit more in on the floors, the structure will be done and then the next step is replacement panels for the rockers and rear lips. I also need from fenders, always prowl g Craigslist so if you guys see a decent factory set of steel fender s let me know!What's everyones take on fiberglass fenders? Stay away or whatSent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549876 Share on other sites More sharing options...
May 27, 20186 yr comment_549878 On 5/27/2018 at 4:33 PM, Elliott000 said: Definitely nice knowing I have a dead to nuts center line. Tomorrow I'm going to triple check the car is level them plumb some points down and ensure everything up front is square at least within reason. Once I fi ish the driver side frame rail and tie a bit more in on the floors, the structure will be done and then the next step is replacement panels for the rockers and rear lips. I also need from fenders, always prowl g Craigslist so if you guys see a decent factory set of steel fender s let me know! What's everyones take on fiberglass fenders? Stay away or what Sent from my SM-N950W using Tapatalk Depending on what you need for rockers. There is a member on here that makes some of the parts that are NLA. @disepyon you aught to read his build thread Link to comment https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/60011-wheelbase-predicament/?&page=2#findComment-549878 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment