76 280Z

[wal280z]

On 8/4/2019 at 6:22 PM, wal280z said:

I know you aren't me, and I'm not you, but $5K is just too much for that non-EGR intake...

 

On 8/4/2019 at 8:42 PM, Zed Head said:

Curious as to how an EGR intake adds value to a car.  Not arguing, just wondering.

@Zed Head To me, a NON EGR intake = less parts to replace when they go bad. Same logic I use when it comes to under-achieving engines that get turbo treatment from the factory.

KISS* principle. Might not be appropriate to current emission laws, but KISS*.

*to those just waking up = KISS = Keep It Simple, Stupid

[Zed Head]

Not so sure about your grammar there, wal.  You said $5K is just too much for a non-EGR intake, but now you seem to be saying the non-EGR is better.

You said "non-EGR" in a negative fashion,. "too much" is a negative,  now you're saying "NON EGR " in  a positive fashion, "less parts to replace" is a postive.  Were you using sarcasm?

No big deal, I'm just not understanding what you wrote first, then your reply to your own writing.  

[wheee!]

I believe he meant that "non-EGR" was better and valuable, but still not worth 5K... that's what I got out of it anyways...