Jump to content

Featured Replies


I would say not - the rear spoiler doesn't provide enough down force at subsonic speeds - but it looks cool and balances the car (visually at least).

  On 8/29/2019 at 9:33 PM, wheee! said:

My main concern is that without the air dam, I will have a very light front end with the spoiler on the rear.

My urethane Xenon made a huge difference on my '77. My high speed worries were the wiper blades lifted at about 110 on the speedometer. That's where I lift. ?

20160702_093134.jpg

I am hesitant to use urethane on the front air dam due to the flex at high speed. I have seen too many videos of cars on the Hwy with their air dam folded over and the driver oblivious because it looks normal when parked.
Plus I like the classic Jag profile of the rounded catfish front end. The BRE cuts a clean profile of the front.

  On 8/30/2019 at 8:32 PM, ryanotown22 said:
I think I saw a fix for the hwy speed folding issue but not sure where I saw that at.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I know it can be fixed with reinforcing rods etc, I just don’t think you should have to do that. I prefer the fibreglas versions.
  On 8/30/2019 at 8:32 PM, ryanotown22 said:

I think I saw a fix for the hwy speed folding issue but not sure where I saw that at.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Probably something like mine, works okay now but you really shouldn't have to repair it before you install it, I wish now I had kept my type 1 fiberglass air dam.

 

IMG_0328.JPG

IMG_0429.JPG

I went for the Type 1 fibreglass for the 240Z since fitting the 240 valence is not possible with the lower 280Z frame. Looks neat with the modified 240Z grill.

 

DSC_0435.JPG

1IMG_0110 (37).JPG

IMG_1608.JPG

Edited by EuroDat

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.