Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

Weird No Start Condition - 260Z


SteveJ

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Racer X said:

Have you tried using Windows Virtual PC?

I found it useful to run some OEM (GM, Ford Service Bay, International trucks) service manuals from the 1990's that run from CDs, and refused to load and run on Windows 7 Pro.

I don't have Windows 7 Pro on the two laptops with Windows 7. The software does run in compatibility mode. I probably just need to see if replacement batteries are still available for the laptops. They are Toshibas, so that improves the chances. When I make it a priority, it could happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SteveJ said:

OBD-I does use the flashing lights after you put the paper clip in the right terminals of the ECU. There is software that allows a PC to read the codes, too, without having to count blinks.

From my Fiero days (88), I have a small amount of experience with the system a little older than what you're working with.  I don't know if they called it the same thing in the later cars, but back in 88, they used a system they called "ALDL", which is Assembly Line Diagnostic Link.

And the most common software used to talk to it was "WinALDL". Not sure if any of that is what you're dealing with in the later version you have, but that's what it was "way back then".

I (thankfully) know very little about the GM EFI, but I do remember there was a there was a clear flood mode. Thankfully mine mostly just worked fine and I didn't have to troubleshoot. I did jumper the ALDL pins once or twice to blink the stored codes out on the check engine light, but that's about it.

In any event, glad you made progress with the issue and things seem to be pretty much back to where you want them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveJ said:

I don't have Windows 7 Pro on the two laptops with Windows 7. The software does run in compatibility mode. I probably just need to see if replacement batteries are still available for the laptops. They are Toshibas, so that improves the chances. When I make it a priority, it could happen.

You should be able to download, install and run the Microsoft Virtual Machine on any version of Windows 7.

As for laptop batteries, I long ago gave up on running laptops without an AC power cord. My newest laptop is well over 10 years old, and works great, and will even run for a short time without AC power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ye

1 minute ago, Captain Obvious said:

From my Fiero days (88), I have a small amount of experience with the system a little older than what you're working with.  I don't know if they called it the same thing in the later cars, but back in 88, they used a system they called "ALDL", which is Assembly Line Diagnostic Link.

And the most common software used to talk to it was "WinALDL". Not sure if any of that is what you're dealing with in the later version you have, but that's what it was "way back then".

I (thankfully) know very little about the GM EFI, but I do remember there was a there was a clear flood mode. Thankfully mine mostly just worked fine and I didn't have to troubleshoot. I did jumper the ALDL pins once or twice to blink the stored codes out on the check engine light, but that's about it.

In any event, glad you made progress with the issue and things seem to be pretty much back to where you want them.

Yep, it's still WinALDL. Now you have to have the right driver to do the USB to serial cable. 

Unplugging the TPS while the car was on did the clear flood mode. I'm not sure if WinALDL could have cleared it. The car really did flood, so I smelled the gas in the garage. That got me believing I was still getting fuel when I wasn't. It just made it where I also dug around and found the lurking issue with the distributor that would probably have caused me problems in the future.

It was a frustrating day, but it got me to learn more about the system I installed, so that is a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SteveJ said:

GM TBI fuel injection with SU carburetors converted to throttle bodies

I know this is off topic, but it intrigued me. After a web search I am still left with questions. 

What throttle bodies, how are they adapted, and what are you using for electronic management?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Racer X said:

I know this is off topic, but it intrigued me. After a web search I am still left with questions. 

What throttle bodies, how are they adapted, and what are you using for electronic management?

 

The throttle bodies are SU carburetors. The domes and float bowls have been removed, and the nozzle is plugged. The injectors sit in adapter plates that replaced the domes.

The kit is from Patton Machine (http://www.pattonmachine.com/) using a GM ECU from Affordable Fuel Injection (https://affordable-fuel-injection.com/). I used -6AN fittings and hose in the engine bay and selected a Walbro fuel pump because it fit better on the fuel pump mounting bracket on the 260Z. I had to run a tap into the throttle linkage for the shaft that operates the TPS. The headers already had an O2 bung hole courtesy of the gentleman I purchased them from.

I was able to tuck the ECU on the firewall in the passenger footwell on the firewall. I utilized many factory connections in the wiring, so it ended up being fairly clean.

The GM TBI also runs at low pressure (<15PSI), so you don't have to swap everything over to high pressure hoses. Another benefit is that there are TONS of GM TBI parts available along with plenty of information online.

20201113_144612.jpg

I believe you could also work with Rick Patton to integrate a MegaSquirt ECU into the system to give better flexibility in tuning.

I totaled up the cost of swapping in 280Z FI parts and MS. It was more than this kit. This kit is also different from what you'll typically see in Z cars. Only a handful of people have done this kit.

I am tempted to do this on the 240Z when I make it a priority to get it running again.

 

 

Edited by SteveJ
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, do you know if the original GM system was actually designed to utilize two throttle bodies (with two injectors), or just one?  In other words, was your system originally designed to run one TBI but is now running two smaller injectors in parallel instead and letting the O2 sensor provide the feedback to level everything out?

Back when I was current with my GM stuff, there was just one throttle body and they used that system on some of the in-line engines. I don't know if they ever did two of them on a V-engine or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Captain Obvious said:

Steve, do you know if the original GM system was actually designed to utilize two throttle bodies (with two injectors), or just one?  In other words, was your system originally designed to run one TBI but is now running two smaller injectors in parallel instead and letting the O2 sensor provide the feedback to level everything out?

Back when I was current with my GM stuff, there was just one throttle body and they used that system on some of the in-line engines. I don't know if they ever did two of them on a V-engine or something like that.

In the drawings of the system I downloaded, I found two injector signals.

Picture 7.jpg

Having said that, there are photos on the Patton Machine website showing triple TBI setups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, SteveJ said:

The throttle bodies are SU carburetors. The domes and float bowls have been removed, and the nozzle is plugged. The injectors sit in adapter plates that replaced the domes.

The kit is from Patton Machine (http://www.pattonmachine.com/) using a GM ECU from Affordable Fuel Injection (https://affordable-fuel-injection.com/). I used -6AN fittings and hose in the engine bay and selected a Walbro fuel pump because it fit better on the fuel pump mounting bracket on the 260Z. I had to run a tap into the throttle linkage for the shaft that operates the TPS. The headers already had an O2 bung hole courtesy of the gentleman I purchased them from.

I was able to tuck the ECU on the firewall in the passenger footwell on the firewall. I utilized many factory connections in the wiring, so it ended up being fairly clean.

The GM TBI also runs at low pressure (<15PSI), so you don't have to swap everything over to high pressure hoses. Another benefit is that there are TONS of GM TBI parts available along with plenty of information online.

20201113_144612.jpg

I believe you could also work with Rick Patton to integrate a MegaSquirt ECU into the system to give better flexibility in tuning.

I totaled up the cost of swapping in 280Z FI parts and MS. It was more than this kit. This kit is also different from what you'll typically see in Z cars. Only a handful of people have done this kit.

I am tempted to do this on the 240Z when I make it a priority to get it running again.

 

 

Awesome!

Thanks so much for the information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.