I found #62150(something like that)?

[thefastestz]

I found a 70 240z at a shop on the way home from school.

The owner said that some one left it there years ago running to replace the struts and never came back for it.

Maybe I will go back and visit and take some pics.

Some of the things i noticed were that the air cleaner was gone and there were no vents on the rear hatch..

As for the rust issue I'll just have to pull up carpet and post the pics.

Maybe he will let it go for 200 or so.

I don't have the money but if there is hardly any rust i know maybe someone else

could save this early Z car.

[Bambikiller240]

Originally posted by thefastestz

I found a 70 240z ...........

SN# 62150 would not be a 1970, it would be a 1972 240Z (manufactured around 1/72).

[thefastestz]

Ahhhhh............so this is a case of id plates switched.

And I was wondering why it had no hatch vents.

My 73 was 153000 somthing so they made that many?!!

Or did they change the numbering system?

I know you sure would know about this matter too.

And I thought I actually found a real early Z:stupid: :stupid: :stupid:

Well now I know. I guess watch out for a 72 with 70 ID tags coming from corpus christi, tx!!

[Bambikiller240]

Originally posted by thefastestz

Ahhhhh............so this is a case of id plates switched.

And I was wondering why it had no hatch vents.

My 73 was 153000 somthing so they made that many?!!

Or did they change the numbering system?

I know you sure would know about this matter too.

And I thought I actually found a real early Z:stupid: :stupid: :stupid:

Well now I know. I guess watch out for a 72 with 70 ID tags coming from corpus christi, tx!!

According to Nissan Motors - as stated in the "DATSUN 280ZX" book published in 1978 by Nissan Motor Company.

This table represents "units produced" within each calendar year - not units sold during the Model Year. ie. 500 240Z's were produced in calendar year 1969, however they were for the most part sold in the North American Market as 1970 Model Year 240Z's. Likewise there were aprox 10,500 1970 Model Year 240Z's sold in North America, the remainder of the 1970 production were sold as 1971 Model Year 240Z's. (the next Model Year cars, were usually introduced in advance of the calendar year here in the U.S. ie Sept./Oct. 1970 introduction of 1971 Model year cars)

***********USA*****Canada****Australia*****Great Britain*****Others

1969--------------500----------0----------------0---------------------0-----------------0

1970----------16,215-------1201----------- 319-------------------2-----------------3

1971----------33,684-------3440------------894-----------------264---------------89

1972----------52,628-------4020------------362-----------------549--------------494

1973----------45,588-------2537------------783----------------1,114-------------430

1974----------40,172-------1370------------442-----------------129----------------1

1974 2+2------9,499--------766-------------599-----------------320--------------153

1975----------40,216-------1153------------198-------------------20---------------23

1975 2+2----11,594--------329------------742-----------------139--------------493

1976----------45,766--------876------------385-------------------00---------------07

1976 2+2-----13,792-------351-----------1615-----------------444--------------454

1977-----------54,594-----1005--------------98------------------312--------------63

PS: Boy, I sure wish Mikey would allow ".doc" attachments. Formatting tables like this by hand/eye is extremely tedious.

[Alfadog]

Ooooh, finally, figures for Aus. Thanks mate

[Zedrally]

Alfa,

Those Aussie figures are pretty "rubbery

That 2+2 I picked up was a 73 production model, I'll concede it most probably was sold in 74, but the plates identify it as a 73 production.

Also where are the local market [Japan] numbers, in others, I think not?

Sadly we may never know the true figures and an educated guess is the best one can hope for. [unless Alan has access to more reliable figures]?

[Alfadog]

Yeah, I undestand that the figures are probably not totally 100% correct, but unfortunately those figures are the only ones I've got so make do eh.

They give you a good general feeling to the numbers at least, but yeah it would be nice to have Japan included...................

[HS30-H]

I'm afraid the figures from that "Datsun 280ZX" book are just nonsense, and cause more confusion than anything else. Its a real shame that Nissan ( USA? ) could publish something like that without making a better job of it.

One of the main problems is that it is totally ignoring all the non-"240Z" models. I can't get my head around this. Why do people always talk about the "240Z" without including all the other models of S30-series Z? The HS30 and HLS30 were only TWO types of S30-series Z. I think its a big mistake to think of the 240Z model as being anything other than a PART of the S30-series Z range.

I also think the American "model year" system tends to cloud the issue of actual manufacturing date. I'm personally more interested in the actual date that the car went through the Factory than the "Model Year" that the US-market assigned to it ( although I do understand WHY this system was created ). Lots of production and sales figures mix these up, and it makes things even harder to understand. You can see this confusion from the amount of questions that arise over the actual dates of these cars.

I'm sorry to say that I have still not seen any DEFINITIVE production figures that include ALL the iterations of the S30 model range. I have several different sets of figures for the Japanese market, let alone any other markets and models:ermm: .

Alan T.

[Alfadog]

Well thanks for the input Alan, I certainly wont take the data for 100% accurate, but it's all I've got to hold onto :sleepy:

[Carl Beck]

Allen T Wrote:

AT> I'm afraid the figures from that "Datsun 280ZX" book are just nonsense,

AT> and cause more confusion than anything else. Its a real shame that

AT> Nissan ( USA? ) could publish something like that without making a better

AT> job of it.

Hi Allen (everyone)

I'd be interested to know why or what you believe is "nonsense". There is an old saying that might apply here - "all things taken within context". Looking at the intent/purposes of the 280ZX book I thought it was pretty well done.

Taken within the context of the published data - I find the figures line up pretty well with what we are finding in the real world. They may/may not be "exact" but seem to be pretty close when looking at Production vs Sales.

AT> One of the main problems is that it is totally ignoring all the non-"240Z"

AT> models. I can't get my head around this. Why do people always talk about

AT> the "240Z" without including all the other models of S30-series Z?

AT> The HS30 and HLS30 were only TWO types of S30-series Z.

I believe there are lots of reasons. One may disagree with them - but they are there and they are reasonable IMHO.

1. First and foremost - the Datsun 240-Z was specified, designed and intended to be a Sports/GT for the US Market. No doubt Mr. Matsuo always thought of it as a Japanese Car (he lived in Japan;-), - but even he admits the US requirements drove the design and the US was the market it was intended for. The fact that a few were produced for the Domestic Market and a few more were shipped to other Countries doesn't change that fact.

2. We can argue about the exact numbers - but the fact is something close to 90% of the S30's chassis were built for, and sold to, the US market.

AT> I think its a big mistake to think of the 240Z model as being anything

AT> other than a PART of the S30-series Z range.

Well that's one way to look at it. I'd suggest that conceptually, it should be thought of the other way - ie. the 10% of production of the "S30" chassis - that accounted for "all other models" was a small part, a side track, a variance of, a side note to - the production and sales history of the Datsun 240-Z.

Looked at by the numbers... on average for 48 months (1970,71,72,73) the HLS30 production averaged 3,319 units per month - while the entire production of the HS30 models totaled 4,039. Rounding the numbers for discussion - that's 160,000 vs 4,000 or you can see that the HS30's accounted for a mere 2.5%.

AT> I also think the American "model year" system tends to cloud the issue of actual AT> manufacturing date.

I don't understand why you would think that. The US is the only country that required the Date of Manufacture be fixed to the car. At least our system gives us the month and year our cars were actually produced.

For the HS30's it's pretty easy to compare known production dates with the original engines installed and arrive at a pretty close "production date".

The Fairlady's are harder to pin down - and at present we don't have a large enough statistical sample to derive much information from either. However Nissan's Technical Service Bulletins do offer some clues.

AT> I'm personally more interested in the actual date that the

AT> car went through the Factory than the "Model Year" that the

AT> US-market assigned to it

I agree that production dates are important and interesting - but here we get back to the context - they are important and interesting only when associated with some production or design change for example (yes/no). A production date by itself doesn't tell you much does it? - unless you associate it with some other useful data/facts.

AT> ( although I do understand WHY this system was created ). Lots of

AT> production and sales figures mix these up, and it makes things even

AT> harder to understand. You can see this confusion from the amount

AT> of questions that arise over the actual dates of these cars.

I understand what your saying and that is indeed somewhat true - I think the core problem is all to often people are too loose with terms - they use them incorrectly or they don't pay specific enough attention to them. People mix/intermix/confuse "Production Numbers" with "Sales Numbers"... Nissan kept them pretty well defined, even if a lot of the data they published were not 100% accurate.

That is one reason we started documenting VIN's, Production Dates and Original Engine Serial Numbers years ago.

For example that Nissan 280ZX Book - clearly states that it is giving "Production Volume" numbers by year - not Sales Numbers - and it's showing a graphic example of the number of "Exports" vs "Total Production"... While it isn't 100% accurate - it does give one a pretty good picture of the over-all story.

AT> I'm sorry to say that I have still not seen any DEFINITIVE production

AT> figures that include ALL the iterations of the S30 model range.

AT> I have several different sets of figures for the Japanese market,

AT> let alone any other markets and models .

Yes - it is too bad for those of us interested in the history of the Z Car. On the other hand Nissan and their Dealers were/are in business to sell cars and make profit. I think it's too bad no one outside Nissan was interested in the history of the Z - at the time it was being produced - so records could be verified at the time and kept.

Nissan's Policy is to not keep records past the point of meeting legal requirements for record keeping. Saves them money and records are only used to prosecute law suits;-).

On the other hand, if all that factual data were readily and easily available -this subject would not hold our curiosity nor drive our interest to search for the trivia ;-)

FWIW,

Carl B.

Carl Beck

Clearwater,FL USA

http://ZHome.com

[HS30-H]

Originally posted by Carl Beck

Hi Allen (everyone)

I'd be interested to know why or what you believe is "nonsense". There is an old saying that might apply here - "all things taken within context". Looking at the intent/purposes of the 280ZX book I thought it was pretty well done.

Taken within the context of the published data - I find the figures line up pretty well with what we are finding in the real world. They may/may not be "exact" but seem to be pretty close when looking at Production vs Sales.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

The biggest problem would have to be with that category just tacked onto the end as "Others" like an afterthought. The figures in this category are quite clearly wrong ( as, I suspect, is that first figure of a nice and cosy 500 ) as they must surely include the Japanese Domestic market "HS30" models that were launched in Japan in October 1971. The Factory started churning out hundreds of cars a week for this market, and the figures from the list are obviously wide of the mark.

The biggest problem, as I have pointed out, is this idea of on the one hand making a chart for "Production" of the "240Z / 260Z / 280Z" models ( I presume this must include ALL markets? ) but on the other hand ignoring all the other Domestic models of S30, S30S, PS30, PS30-SB, HS30 and HS30-H et al. Such a list might start to make sense if it attempted to give accurate or even semi-accurate figures for one market or one model / spec. type. To include such a wide range of models in such a wide range of markets, but then to ignore half of the Domestic market, makes it sound perfect for American consumption. Like I've said before - that's looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Perverse really.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl>

1. First and foremost - the Datsun 240-Z was specified, designed and intended to be a Sports/GT for the US Market. No doubt Mr. Matsuo always thought of it as a Japanese Car (he lived in Japan;-), - but even he admits the US requirements drove the design and the US was the market it was intended for. The fact that a few were produced for the Domestic Market and a few more were shipped to other Countries doesn't change that fact.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

There you go again! Talking about the "Datsun 240-Z" as something that was specified and designed as something quite separate and distinct from any other models of Z car that were in gestation at the same time. You seem to be unable to stop yourself from thinking in this way. It really is most odd.

Its also most odd the way that you simply write off the Domestic Market, even to the point where you try to make the Japanese market sound smaller than almost every other market. Is this part of your philosophy of treating the non "240Z" models as non-relevant to the history of the Z car? As for Mr Matsuo, I think you might like to take a little bit more notice of what he REALLY thinks, and to read between the lines a little. He too now speaks from the present, a present where we can see what a success the HLS30 model and its successors were in the US market. When I spoke to him, it was quite clear that he STILL thinks of the car as a Japanese car. I can't imagine Matsuo san hearing that "American Sports Car" quote without feeling somewhat offended.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl>

2. We can argue about the exact numbers - but the fact is something close to 90% of the S30's chassis were built for, and sold to, the US market.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

Big Mac philosophy again. Presumably anything that does not sell well is an automatic failure, and therefore anything aimed at a potentially small market is a also a failure? Only if you are talking purely in economics, in which case anything that sells well in the USA will automatically be judged an economic success, even if there is a version that is ergonomically and dynamically better?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl>

Well that's one way to look at it. I'd suggest that conceptually, it should be thought of the other way - ie. the 10% of production of the "S30" chassis - that accounted for "all other models" was a small part, a side track, a variance of, a side note to - the production and sales history of the Datsun 240-Z.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

You seem to infer again that quantity outweighs any other parameter. In this case, any model that sold more in the USA than in its own Domestic market will have to classify its Domestic sales as a "small part / side track / side note to" the US market. Maybe its easy to think that way when you are sitting in the USA, but I can't see how anyone outside the US could see it that way.

How does this talk of quantity sold relate to the DESIGN, GESTATION and PROTOTYPES of the Z car? I can't see what it leads to, except the obvious.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl>

Looked at by the numbers... on average for 48 months (1970,71,72,73) the HLS30 production averaged 3,319 units per month - while the entire production of the HS30 models totaled 4,039. Rounding the numbers for discussion - that's 160,000 vs 4,000 or you can see that the HS30's accounted for a mere 2.5%.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

Why are you just comparing the HS30 with the HLS30, and what does it mean? What about all the other models?! If its all just a game of numbers sold, then we KNOW the HLS30 and its successors will "win". But what if the HLS30 model had not sold so well? The story of the car's gestation and manufacture would not be any different until the lack of sales started to bite. That's why your point of view is so perverse. It seems to revolve solely around how many cars of a certain type were sold.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carl>

Yes - it is too bad for those of us interested in the history of the Z Car. On the other hand Nissan and their Dealers were/are in business to sell cars and make profit. I think it's too bad no one outside Nissan was interested in the history of the Z - at the time it was being produced - so records could be verified at the time and kept.

Nissan's Policy is to not keep records past the point of meeting legal requirements for record keeping. Saves them money and records are only used to prosecute law suits;-).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

I still cannot believe that there is nothing that has not been dug up yet. Even in just the last year I have been on the receiving end of some pretty amazing information that I thought I would never get. Most of this is related to the activities of the Competition Department at Nissan, and especially in relation to the domestic "Works" race and rally cars. I was told many times that this information did not exist. The information exists, but the main problem has been to find a person within the organisation that has both the will and the authority to dig it out. In some cases, the information is no longer in the hands of Nissan themselves. The easiest thing for them to say is that records have not been kept, or have been disposed of. This blind-alley approach easily gets rid of probing journalists or over-enthusiastic enquirers.

I'm sure that you ( like me ) cannot believe that you know just about all there is to know about this subject. My 'pet' area is the Works race and rally activities, and almost every day I learn something new that leads on to another question or poses another conundrum. This is fun! I get the feeling that a lifetime of research will still leave a majority of my questions unanswered. I could not really say that for any of the other cars that I have owned in the past.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Carl>

On the other hand, if all that factual data were readily and easily available -this subject would not hold our curiosity nor drive our interest to search for the trivia ;-)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan>

Absolutely.

Carl, have you ever been to Japan? When I read your bibliography I see very little mention of Japanese resources. I would recommend this line of enquiry rather than reading certain Z-related books and magazine articles from the UK. It might help you with your perspective.:classic:

And what does FWIW mean?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alan T.

[Zed@Work]

Originally posted by BambiKiller240

...PS: Boy, I sure wish Mikey would allow ".doc" attachments. Formatting tables like this by hand/eye is extremely tedious.

You can format the text in Word and then use the

[code ] tags to post it here, but you still may have to do a little tweaking.

 		USA		Canada		Australia	Great Britain	Others 

1969		500		0		0		0		0 
1970		16,215		1201		319		2		3 
1971		33,684		3440		894		264		89 
1972		52,628		4020		362		549		494 
1973		45,588		2537		783		1,114		430 
1974		40,172		1370		442		129		1 
1974 2+2	9,499		766		599		320		153 
1975		40,216		1153		198		20		23 
1975 2+2	11,594		329		742		139		493 
1976		45,766		876		385		00		07 
1976 2+2	13,792		351		1615		444		454 
1977		54,594		1005		98		312		63