Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

How to start an argument...


halz

Recommended Posts

But it still seems silly to me....I'm sure that the all the entire world has it's share of "maintenance-ignorant buyers" .

It also seems that there are some "geographically-ignorant" authors out there since America contains Canada, Brazil, Mexico, The United States, etc....

Either way, would not a V8 suffer in the hands of bad maintenance as well as a turbo engine would and therefore they should not send anything to the U.S. market? Just trying to follow the logic here and it's not adding up... Sounds more like this is just a silly comment of a lone writer rather than something that a manufacturer would say....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, this topic certainly did provoke some discussion didn't it? I certinly did not intend to suggest that our American friends are all 'maintenance-ignorant'... as we all know, every country has its fair share of those people. I am also sure that members of our exlted group are either able to perform maintenance themselves or at least recognise when they cannot!

Re: Turbo mainenance requirements vs non-turbos. I think that the only caution to the owner of a turbo-owner would be on the subject of oil. The type of oil used for turbo applications (if I recall correctly) must be able to cope with turbines that spin at 10s of thousands of RPM rather than simply an engine which may reach 6-7000rpm...

Might be wrong, long time since I drove/owned a turbo car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as oils, any oil you can buy in the U.S. is gonna be good enough for the requirements of a turbo. The oils are so much better now than even 5 years ago.

Anyone that designs a turbocharger for a mass market that requires aerospace skills to maintain is doing something seriously wrong in the first place... Q.E.D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TKR514: To generalise a bit, the reason is that a smaller capacity boosted motor, is going to be more so "stressed" than a larger capacity, lower reving NA motor. The more highly stressed an engines state of tune, the greater the importance of proper maintenance on it.

Personally I feel rather strongly that they should stick to a turbo 6. Mind you I wouldn't trust what comes out of wheels mag. Different mags have been telling us what motor would supposedly be in there for ages now. AFAIK the V8 idea was dropped a while back, and they were going to go for a twin turbo VQ33.

Really though...it's just a guessing game till nissan officailly tells us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, but "stress" is also relative. A low compression turbo engine might have less stress than a high compression V8 for day-to-day city driving. I would also assume that the new 350Z N/A is a LOT more stressed at making almost 300HP than an 83ZX turbo making 180HP.

Like I said, it's gotta be one dumb writer's comment instead of a real techical issue.

Just try to find ANY old cars in Nissan's home turf before saying that the U.S. is less capable of keeping cars running for a long time. Maybe THEY are affraid that the home market is unable to keep one in tune well enough to pass Japan's stricter smog standards every year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeha I know what you mean. I was just stating that as a generalisation.

I would have thought that the US gets the NA V8 as that's what they seem to go for. Larger NA motors as a pose to smaller boosted motors? Or maybe that's just what nissan believes.

Same reason the US got the KA24's as a pose the the SR20DET in the silvia's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOLROFLLOLROFL

Hey there halz,

Am I correct in asuming that your original post was done "tongue in cheek"??? You wouldn't have been suggesting that such a rediculous comment was true.

I also treated it as a joke and actually expected our septic cousins to throw some dirt our way.

Speaking of which, I haven't noticed anything from tanny lately.

Rick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I correct in asuming that your original post was done "tongue in cheek"???

Rick, my tongue was formly lanted in my check when I typed the original post...alas howver, it IS a direct quote from wheels magazine. Take it as you like, but I think most of the replies have summed up the situation pretty well. That is, there are some mechanical ignoramuses out there whic give rise to the opinion expressed there.

Happily its not one which applies to the broader Z-community!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I know what you are talking about. As Halz explained I always knew it as the birdhsh*t catcher on the front of the car

How come you blokes don't speak the queens bloody english!

A hood is something you put on to make sure the missus doesn't see you out with the boys.

Regards

Shirly Biker Temple:cheeky:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.