Jump to content
Email-only Log-Ins Coming in December ×

IGNORED

rotary engine


Fun_in_my_z

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by CoastGuardZ

I've never heard of a car getting hit by lightining a burning. It would seem that the tires would isolate it from ground at stop it from getting hit to begin with:ermm:

Nate

Really. Maybe you should see the video i've seen of a 4wd driving down the road, It gets hit by lightning. I saw it slowed down frame by frame. Hit the car right in the roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lightning will jump any gap given half a chance. A 4-6 inch piece of rubber will offer little resistance (no pun intended)LOL

But as you are in a farraday cage......you should not get struck. Current will flow on the outside of the car and not you.

DON'T GO OUT AND TRY IT THOUGH:devious: :dead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by CoastGuardZ

rotary has rotors spun through the center by an "eccentric" shaft. Because there are no pistons there is no crank and no rods which are the two key ingredients for angular momentum aka torque. To make up for the lack of torque Mazda tossed on the turbo charger and bang it's light and quick.

Nate

What I was trying to say earlier in the post :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by 240znz

Lightning will jump any gap given half a chance.

Given the fact that the lightning has just come through several miles of air would reinforce the idea that nothing's going to stop it. Maybe it was aiming for a spot on the ground that the car just happened to drive over. :stupid:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tires conduct electricity. Which is why you are protected in a car. Lightning has a path to ground. If it didn't, lightning strikes of cars would be fatally destructive events. One of the properties that have to be designed into tires is proper conductivity.

Regarding rotaries and torque, the main reason they don't make much is low displacement. 159 lb-ft is tremendous for 1.3 liters! But of course some would argue 2.6 to be a better effective displacement since the each rotor has a "power stroke" for each crank rev. Anyway, Make a 3.5 liter rotary and it'll make a lot more torque. Of course the fuel mileage would be truly abysmal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow! i didnt know he started his pri=oject already. i wonder wat the weight distrubution is gonna be like? I remember he was talkin bout doin the swap at the z fest buy the bay. Now if i had the funds, i would be droppin a 20b in mine:devious:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.