rturbo 930

This is where the roof overlaps the quarter panel. If I remember right, the roof skin has a flange at the back, so you'll likely want to cut a little below that joint. I've been trying to find pictures on google to refresh my memory on how it goes together, but not finding much.

Yup, front fitment is way off, totally sunken in the fender. Rear isn't bad. The bumpers look bad, and the front fender arch looks silly with how much it was moved up. Having the door and rocker combined ruins the proportions of the door since it is now much more square. Hopefully the actual rocker is still there underneath since it's a major structural component of the car. I really don't see the point of having done all this. It doesn't look good, and as mentioned, there isn't even a need for such wide tires with a stock L28. As far as handling goes, I suspect there's a limit to how much rubber is really needed to have fun with throwing the car around, and I'd say he has way more than he needs. Also, If I was doing a build like this with custom wheels, my choice would definitely not be five slot mags. It's surprising he couldn't think of anything better than that, which makes me think he's just not very familiar with these cars, or Japanese cars in general. I have to agree with grannyknot that this guy is a bodyman who thinks he is a designer, but is not. This is not an improvement on the original design. I've seen the results from people who can rework a classic design and have it come out looking better than the original, and this is not it.

Since it's a one off with no plans to sell, I suspect it may just be a passion project of some Nissan employees. Who knows. It does seem a bit odd and out of nowhere. Pretty cool regardless.

I'm not sure that makes sense. Would it even be legal for any kind of competitive racing? In that regard, it has the same problem as the OS Giken and Datsunworks DOHC heads.

I measured the tail light panel holes to be about 5.5 to 5.8mm, and the corresponding holes in the hatch slam panel on the car appear to be 4.5mm on both my 280Z and 240Z.

I can't remember what the smaller bolt hole is for. I might be wrong but I think there's a bracket that the plastic cover attaches to, it might be for that.

Okay, apologies for the delay, busy time of year. Hopefully these photos give you an idea of how it's put together. Since your 75 doesn't have the strut tower mounted belts, I suspect you don't have the plate like the later cars, and it's probably just a bit of cardboard on top to help support the vinyl covering like the 240Zs have.

I'm not sure why you think it's accessible then. The cavity is closed by the wheel well on the bottom and the seat belt mount plate on top. If your '75 already has the top plates installed but without tapped and threaded plate that the seat belt mounts to, then you're probably best off drilling out the spot welds to remove the top piece, weld on your threaded mount, and reattach the top plate. I can take photos of my car if needed, it's a '76, and everything is exposed and easy to see right now.

You don't access the underside. There's a plate that's drilled and tapped that is welded to the underside of the plate that the inertial reel bolts to. In the above photo of a 240Z, you're looking at where the strut tops mount, not where the seatbelt reels mount.

If the rails have no damage, then I see no point in replacing them. I think you can probably get away with just replacing the strip of metal where the rail meets the floor, which should be an easy enough patch to make and shape with basic tools. Areas of surface rust or minor pitting can be treated with naval jelly or similar. It's a much smaller job than total replacement of floors and rails, would save you a good bit of money, and would also serve as a good learning experience. Also, it's a good place to learn being the floor since it's not visible. But, as Hussein says below, you need to know exactly how much rust damage there is before you can begin. Detailed, well lit photos would be helpful, and we don't know yet if the damage goes beyond just the front floor section.

I don't see a reason to buy floors, and I don't know what condition your frame rails are in, I haven't really seen a clear shot of them where I know what I'm looking at. Your driver's floor looks like it has rust through only where it joins the frame rail, and some surface rust around the drain holes. Is there something I'm not seeing? I'm just hesitant to suggest that you go ahead and completely cut out your floors since that's a pretty significant job. I also just don't see the point of a whole floor if a patch is all that is needed. Total replacement only makes sense IMO when it's less work than doing a bunch patches. Do your frame rails still have the flanges on them where the floors are rusted? Are they rotted through on the bottom? Are they badly dented? I just went back and read your initial post again. Sounds like you're not going to be the one doing the work. If so I think the question of what you should buy should be left to the person doing the work. Also sounds like you're having trouble finding someone to do the work, so I'll throw this out there. Tim at https://industrygarage.com/. He's a Z guy and his work can be seen at the Street Bandito youtube channel. They're in the same building as his father's body shop in Baltimore where he used to work, and I know he does some customer work. Not sure if he'd be interested in your project, but worth a shot if you're having trouble finding someone.

They are not the same. The rails won't fit. The toe board might fit on the driver's side with some work, not sure about the passenger side, the floor steps down on one side of the rail. Your car being a 2+2 will only complicate matters, although if you're only doing the front footwell area it may not be a problem. You will need to find the appropriate 280Z equivalent parts, or learn how to shape metal. I would also consider patching instead of replacing, from the photos the full extent of the damage doesn't seem to be revealed, it may or may not warrant full replacement. Get all the tar off the floor before making that call.

My understanding is that removing the exhaust liners ruins the flow of the head. Without them the exhaust ports are too big and/or the wrong shape for ideal flow characteristics.

I'd try removing the fuzzy covers before going out and buying replacement visors. Wouldn't be surprised if the original material is underneath.

I don't think you're understanding or clearly reading his post, because he did not say that the wood composite (which is probably the most accurate way to describe it) is inferior to solid wood. He is saying the opposite of that, that a traditional wood rimmed steering wheel would be inferior to the wood composite wheel in the Z. I don't understand the problem here. To say that something is made of wood means something very specific, which is that something has been made using pieces of solid wood, carved out of a whole tree. This is not that. It is wood that has been reduced to wood fibers, and then put back together again with some kind of binding agent. To say that it is made of wood, in the exact same way that a chair is made of wood, with no meaningful distinction is simply not accurate. I think zKars summed it up nicely on the previous page. Made with wood, but not made of wood. And held together with a resin or something, in the same way fiberglass or carbon fiber is, which IMO would make it a wood composite. Still mostly wood, but not quite wood.