Jon pretty much said what I was going to say. Higher elevation = less risk of detonation (less cylinder pressure because of thinner atmosphere) and raising compression from 9:1 to 10:1 doesn't do a whole lot in and of itself (~3% gain according to "Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals", John B. Heywood). As far as lightened flywheels go, we've had this disussion on the board before. The link Jon posted is actually the best I've seen regarding the effects of flywheels (and inertia in general), and is exactly what I was talking about in the prior discussion. A lighter flywheel changes the "effective" mass of the vehicle, and moreso in 1st gear than 5th because of "effective" inertia due to gearing. We (doradox and I) eventually settled the disussion saying that we're both essentially saying the same thing, but in different ways. After a long conversation with an engineering-minded cousin of mine, I gained a deeper understanding of the true differences in views (makes more power vs. removes weight). This all comes down to "free-body diagrams" and Newton's 2nd Law (F=ma). If you isolate the car as whole, lower flywheel inertia is represented as a loss in overall weight. Since motive force stays equal (flywheels don't change engine output), in order for acceleration to increase the mass must proportionally decrease. Since the flywheel rotates, taking 10lb off the flywheel is not the same as 10lb off a non-rotating component, thus the effective weight. Now, if we isolate the drive-wheels in a free-body diagram, we see a different story. The wheels themselves don't change in mass, but acceleration increases. Thus, to the wheels, it looks like more power is being made (more force available to drive the wheels). As you can see, both are valid points of view, if we understand that there are differences in what we're talking about (the whole car vs. just the drive-wheels). Personally, I think it makes more sense to view it form an "effective weight" perspective (the whole car) since that is the actual derived quantity. As you can see in the link, the "effective power" increase is just an approximation of how much weight loss increases acceleration vs. an effectively equal gain in power. It's the same as pulling out the seats of your car and calling it a power gain. It just makes more sense to me, but for those that want to look at isolated drive-wheels, have at it!