Zed Head

$25,400, reserve not met. Something's not right. http://www.ebay.com/itm/281487585612?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_sacat%3D0%26_nkw%3D281487585612%26_rdc%3D1

If the outer bushings aren't loose/worn, you might just leave them alone. You can remove the locking pin and the end nuts and see how tight the spindle pin is before making a decision. They slide right out for some people.

Any thoughts on when some changes might happen? I know that you're losing viewing time from me, just because of the hard to read font. The site used to be pleasing just to look at and browse, now other sites are more pleasing. This one has lost a lot. In addition to the small washed out font, the actual size of the useful content has been reduce by about 20%, with the big empty bar on the side. I'm effectively looking at a smaller monitor. Used to be 15", now it's 12". Edit - the brown and gray color scheme is depressing also. A bigger, thicker, darker font everywhere; full width when a thread is opened; and more color on the page would be the first three things I would do . Soon.

You're either joking with the forum or you don't really have much idea what those parts are. Post a picture of what you're working with if you can. If you have an ignition module then you don't have points. What year car is it?

I'm fairly sure that I've read that the ZX crossmember is flipped when you install the T5 in place of the 71B. Search around for instructions on swapping in to a ZX and you might see something. You'll need a custom length propeller shaft also. Many seem to think that the T5 doesn't really offer much over the 71B. "T5" is a buzz term that sounds like a strong transmission, but really there were tens or hundreds of variations,some strong, some weak. FS5R90A is the correct way to identify it. Here's a good link describing the various transmissions. The 71B seems to handle about the same power, according to various threads I've seen. http://www.az-zbum.com/information.transmission.shtml

Apparently the company has been around for quite a while. Just not in the Z world. http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c1s-and-c2s-for-sale-wanted/1512401-first-trade-registry-on-ebay.html

This part of the eBay listing is just total made-up BS. Who do you report them to if they violate the code? Themselves. Beware. H.) Code of Ethics - National/International Association of First Trade Registry. Click on the ME icon. On the positive side - it is a nice-looking car. Isn't it odd though, that he doesn't post the VIN? I found the dash VIN in one of the pictures. I don't know where the other ones are for the early cars. The pictures , by the way, show that whoever took them is a big-game hunter. Lots of dead animal heads. Looks like HLS30-02631

Everything about the style of that eBay listing says "guard your wallet". If the car is that good it would sell itself. Dennis-the-Marketing-Guy's efforts actually reduce the value of the car. I can't imagine being that guy. Weird. http://www.ebay.com/itm/281487585612?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fsch%2Fi.html%3F_from%3DR40%26_sacat%3D0%26_nkw%3D281487585612%26_rdc%3D1 Edit - went with 14 Bold on the font using the Full Editor.

Looks interesting but the guy seems like a shyster. He contradicts himself. Looks like a car dealer to me. Just because you're not licensed doesn't mean you're not. I SPECIALIZE IN "NERVOUS" INTERNET BUYERS!! Call Dennis - Marketing Guy THIS IS NOT AN AUTO DEALER AD

Replay with Quote seems to be broken now also. You're at opposite ends of the "way to do things" spectrum. Good end - I checked the idle throttle switch and full throttle switch at the ECU Not so good - I haven't checked the timing with a timing light, but I have twisted the distributor cap back and forth You might spend a lot of time tuning the engine only to find that it's worn out. That's what I did with my first engine. The valve seals were bad and it sucked a lot of oil and generated a lot of blow-by. But I knew a lot by the time I got through trying to perfect it. You can't go wrong by giving the engine a complete tune-up. The first item in the chapter is valve lash. It doesn't change much over time, but when it's off it has a big effect.

32 psi is not low for idle. It's actually a little bit high. Maybe not because of the FPR or pump, but because intake vacuum is low due to poor running. The FPR drops pressure to offset intake vacuum. Disconnect the vacuum line from the bottom of the FPR when measuring base fuel pressure. you should get ~36-37 psi. The engine probably keeps running with the filler cap off because it's running rich. On the TPS test, make sure that the TPS isn't indicating full throttle all of the time. There's a test in the FSM. You can do it at the ECU connection. Set your probes and move the throttle blade. For 77 there are three state - idle, WOT, and neither of those. You might be stuck on WOT. Then there's the basics of a tune-up - ignition timing, valve lash, air filter. Each little thing will make it run better. If the engine has been neglected, the small things can add up.

Since the temperature for failure is so low, apparently, you might try the opposite of the typical ignition module over-heat test. Instead of cooling the module, heat it up. Start the car, let it run, and blow hot air on the module with a heat gun or hair dryer. If it is the module, the engine should start running poorly or die pretty quickly. Looks like you're almost there. If it's not the module, and you're still getting spark when it dies, then that leaves the injection circuit. Maybe the ECU. Probably best to hope it's the module.

The site's acting weird and won't let me add to my last post so...I was going to add that the reason you don't get a spark is because the current through the coil is never shut off. That's also why the coil gets hot. Current flow is stuck on for some reason. Disconnecting the module will be informative. It does look a lot like a bad module.

The coil got hot just because the key was On? That would be short circuit somewhere after the negative post of the coil. The module could very well be shorted internally. That would heat up the coil and kill the spark, with the key On. Try disconnecting the blue and brown wire from the module and see if the coil still gets hot. If the coil only gets hot when the key is on and the module is connected but not when the module is disconnected that's a sign the the module is shorted/bad. Make sure though, that the blue wire is not shorted to ground anywhere on the way between the module and coil. That would cause the same symptoms.

I almost mentioned the GM HEI also. But I think that 1983 used the E12-92 module, as opposed to E12-80, which has a timing advance circuit, for emission purposes. Kind of like the dual point/pickup Z engines, controlled by a "thermo switch". It's doable, but he'd lose the advance circuit. Probably not a big deal but something to consider. Might be worth the $20 and time though, to just wire in an HEI module to confirm that the stock module is bad, then decide whether or not to spend the $100+ to get the replacement. If it's not the module, he's only out the $20.

Looks like Rockauto has one for ~$85. But with the ZX distributors there are other things that tend to break, like the stator magnet, or the pickup coil, or the bushings in the distributor (which can break the magnet). You might be wasting your money assuming it's the module. Have you checked the distributor for damage? Might be better off to just get a complete distributor. Also on Rockauto for not much more. In Post 30 you didn't mention if the key was on. With the remote starter you can turn the motor but not get spark if the key isn't on. Do the test with the wire first, that will tell you if the the parts after the module are working. Tapping the wire, you will be doing essentially what the module does.

You can connect a jumper wire to the negative post of the coil. Leave the other end hanging in air. Disconnect the center wire of the coil from the distributor cap and place it very close, about a spark plug gap distance, from a ground path, like the intake manifold or the car body. Turn the key to On/Run. Then tap the end of the wire to a ground path, like the engine block or intake manifold. Don't hold it there, just tap it quickly. Each tap should generate a spark at the center coil wire. Every third spark should cause the injectors to all click. If you get spark this way, that means the coil is working correctly, and if you get injector clicking, the ECU and its wiring.

Is the offset the same? Might be better off to use an adapter/spacer if the Bimmer wheels are set in compared to Nissan. If they're set out, then the wheels won't fit right anyway even with the new hubs. Just a consideration before you get too far in to it.

This web page does a good job, in my opinion, of explaining cyclic loading based fatigue, and how it is different from yield strength. You only get so many cycles. Cracking or other stress-risers play a part also. Metal Fatigue and The Factors Which Influence Fatigue, by EPI Inc.

I've removed a couple of those gears. As Darrel says, a small drift or punch is needed to get the pin started out. I had to use pliers to finish pulling it. It's pretty tight. You kind of skipped the step of removing the pinion gear assembly/housing from the transmission. They can get stuck also. A big flat bladed screwdriver in the slot will break it loose but large pliers or vice-grips might be needed to completely remove it. Pad the plier jaws, there are many gear housings out there with ugly teeth marks on them. The metal is soft.

Not much detail, can't even tell if it has an engine. But looks kind of interesting GTO Project Car - Awesome Project

To the basics of the original post - I like the find on the alternative AAR. I've seen the newer designs and pondered if they could be adapted. I'd probably get one from a wrecking yard if I went that way, but the one I have works fine, and I have two more that I've cleaned up and are ready for use if needed. Nissan changed the PCV hose routing in 1977, because of AAR and throttle blade fouling. The newer AAR could have the same problem if the 76 hose configuration is still in place. rcb, the OP is in Canada. In Oregon, I only have to pass idle emissions. All of my AAR's are stock 70's time-frame.

I didn't say the gases weren't checked. I'm just wondering what you meant when you said that it's still too rich. It doesn't matter how many modifications you make if you keep tuning those modifications to the gas analyzer, and the gas analyzer specs. are too rich for your nose. You can tune to the analyzer, or tune to your nose. And, no offense intended, but you should have seen the questions coming about the bypassing the AFM, with all of your experience. "All air must pass through the AFM" is one of the fundamentals of the EFI system.

The stock EFI system is a collection of parts that were all designed to work together. So, with the cam, you're out of spec. anyway. I can't help but point out the contradiction in the above statements though. What you're really saying is that the gas analyzer specifications are too rich. For your nose, I assume. Good luck with the tuning. Not sure why you want to remove the PCV anyway, since it actually cleans combustion byproducts from the crankcase, leading to a cleaner engine. Unless you're looking for that little bit extra of clean air and power that the PCV gases are taking up in the intake air supply at full throttle.

Have you tried the tapping/beating on the ECU trick yet? I've seen it described as working for several people. I also had the transistors in an ECU go bad and they are usually heat sensitive. The final step in the FSM trouble-shooting is usually "replace ECU". Maybe you can find a used one to try.