EuroDat

That manifold is from a 78 280Z or a 79/80 280ZX. The throttle body has a nozzle for the pcv. The later ZX doesn't have it. It has the two connections in the rubber hose betweeen the throttle body and the AFM.

Steve, If its still fitted with the JECS relay you can open them easily and clean the contacts. Mine was playing up and I did that and its been working the last 10 months and no issues.I also have the bosch unit, but you can't open it without breaking the case apart. I have posts in a thread here somewhere with the two next to each other and the JECS open. The bosch unit is readily available if it comes to that. It ws used on Mercedes 280, 300, 350 and 450, Porche, Alfa, Opel and Peugeot in the seventies. Ill post the part numbers later. Chas

Mike, I could upload what I have. Will that be a problem? Don't want to offend anyone. The documents have the Xenon certificate. Chas

John, set you a pm, please read. chas

I think Zed heax or Captain have a set-up with o-ring injectors. I can't remember who. Maybe they will tell you there experience. I thought pallnet made a version for o-rings and a special mounting kit to fix it to the manifold. There is a thread here about it.

Pulled the pump out of the car today to compare the internals. It also has a small leak around the terminals. More notacable in cold weather because the fuel doesn't evapourate so quick and you can see a dip hanging from the terminals. I will start calling them 280ZX (Spare) and 280Z (in car) pumps because they seem to have increased the capacity in the later model. The impeller, rollers and outer ring are 7.5mm in the 280ZX pump and 7.00mm in the 280Z pump. The inlet screens are not interchangable. The 280ZX screen is 1mm bigger than the inside diameter of the 280Z inlet. I am now thinking of swapping the impeller, rollers and outer ring to make one good pump. That would be the 280ZX motor and inlet coupled to the pump middle section from the 280Z pump. After the holiday break Ill try to get a ring and rollers fabricated the spare unit. That will depend on price. Here are some photo's of the parts. 1st row: Rollers showing worn 280ZX roller 2nd row: The outer ring thickness differences. The 280ZX is 7.5mm (0.5mm thicker) 3rd row: Roller length and the inlet filter screen. Won't fit the 280Z without force.

Jim, I have a set of the long ones, I think so anyway. They don't fit my 77 so I thought they are for a 2+2. The guy I got them from said they were for a S30 coupe, but I doubt it. I asked this question a while back and sought of forgot about it. BTW if anyone wants them, they can have them for shipping costs. No damage, but they need polishing. http://www.classiczcars.com/topic/49525-differences-between-the-aluminium-sil-kick-plates-coupe-22/

George, The mans got talent. Awsome work you are doing on the project. Bodywork is not my thing, but I repect you guys for having the dedication and skill to tackle these low vin restorations. Looking forward to seeing more. Chas

I had the samd problem with mine I repaired the reflector section in a thread on this forum. If you can"t find a good set or repair yours pm me.Chas Edit: link added http://www.classiczcars.com/topic/47973-280z-front-turn-signal-refresh/

I suspected they would be 5mm. Thanks for taking the measurements. Looks like Ill be up for a new set of them too.

If you are stripping it don't forget the engine and its components like: alternator - should be a 60 amp internal regulator version. Its bigger than the 77 280Z. distributor with internal ignition unit. webbed inlet manifold in rumorred to be better againsg hot start issue. fuel pump back ag the tank. The fuel pump configuration is a little different but all the essential parts are the same.

Thats true. I forgot about that really wide tolerance for the pressure relief valve. The pressure wasn't worrying me because it was above the 36psi FPR maximum. Its the noise it making when its running at that pressure. I think the vertical lines in the ring and causing the noise when the rollors move over then. Its a lot noisier than the one in the car. I found an old photo of my good pump to compare with these rollers. There is a lot of wear on them judging by the photo. These measure in at Ø4.5mm and Im wondering if they were more like Ø5.0mm when new. I can't confirm that just assuming. The groove is 5.4mm wide which give 0.9mm clearance.

This all started because I was curious why it was making so much noise and performing so badly, but now I think I may have a real chance of improving it. I cleaned up the pump motor end and inlet part today. The first problem was I couldn't think of a way to work the motor end without getting a lot of fine material in the motor. Then I thought of trying grease to fill the holes and later flush it out by pouring fuel in from the outlet end through the motor. It seemed to work ok. Next I sent the drawing of the center ring and the rollers to a machine shop that does work for us. It will be interesting to hear what it will cost to make. In the mean time I will assemble the pump and do a free flow and pressure test to see what the rework has done to its performance. This pump barely making 3.3 (48psi) compared to the other pump making 3.7Barg (54psi). Here are some before and after photo's

Well at least Im not the only one that does that kind of thing. A couple of weeks back I was cleaning my ballast resistor and it looked like new for about 20seconds until I dropped it and it shattered.What are the rollers and impeller like? This one seems worn when I compare it to the phots on Alanticz and from memory of my in car unit. I would like to keep the original style. Thats why Im tinkering with this one. It works, but it sounds awfull and it doesn't pump as much as the one on the car now. Site, Thanks, I have read just about every page on Blues Atlanicz site. Its an ecellent source of info. The tech tip on these pumps is more external and replaceable things like o-rings. My problems with this pump is its worn out. Really no other word for it. Thats why I thought Id play with it a little, if I stuff it up no loss and I can always go aftermarket with the Bosch pump.They use them here a lot on the old BMW, VW, Alfa and porches etc with the bosch J jetronic systems. Bosch still make them in the Cheq republic I think. The maximum pressure is a little higher than the original, but that is controlled by the FPR. Google this part number 0580254984 and you will find them easy enough. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Bosch-0580254984-POMPA-CARBURANTE-ORIGINALE-Volvo-240-turbo-Porche-911-/371382769888?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_101&hash=item56782358e0&vxp=mtr http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CO2LI2/ref=as_sl_pd_tf_lc?tag=boschfuelpumps-20&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=B001CO2LI2&adid=18GFZW2S9TJX21X6FHXH&&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boschfuelpumps.com%2F

A while back I cleaned my 280Z fuel pump and replaced the o-rings. Its running ok and I compared it to an old reserve pump. The reserve pump delivered about 75% of the flow compared to the one in the car. Since these pumps are getting harder to find in good condition I decided to take a closer look at the spare pump. The outside looked shocking, corroded and rusty so I cleaned and painted it to make it look respectable. After opening it up Im wondering it was worth the trouble cleaning and keep it as an emergency unit. The inside is showing a lot more signs of wear compared to the one in the car. There are possabilities to improve it. I was thinking of making a new center section (intermediate part) and maybe new rollers. The inner ring of this part has vertical lines which reduce performance some and make it noisy in operation. These parts are made from hardened steel, maybe steel type S890 (890MPa tear strength) would be suitable. Not sure what it would cost to make. The inlet end plate could be surfaced 0,1mm to remove most of the wear. That would increase the crush on the o-ring, but it should be ok. That should improve the output and reduce the noise a little. Opinions welcome. Here are some photos of the worn parts and a drawing of the part for possible replacement. PumpRing1_Rev0.pdf This post has been promoted to an article

If he has done a valve job and didn't protect the seals when installing them the valve could cut the seal with the groove in the valve stem. Its hard to believe that would use so much oil. No mention of a big cam. If it had a high lift came with the standards oil seals. The spring collar can crush the seals and destroy them when the valve is at its lowest.

Im wondering what the compression is. A F54 flat top with a N47 head will be running high compression somewhere around 10.5:1. Valve seals typically smoke when you coast down a hill then use the throttle. The high vacuum when coasting sucks in a lot of oil and the engine burns it all when it back under load. If he did this N47 mod on an old tired bottom end it could be ready to give up. Thats often the trouble with unknown history. Its generally not very good otherwise he would tell you all about it.......

That seems to stick in my memory as well. Its going back 3 years this September. Like I said in the ealier post, It sounds awsome. Not what you would expect from a 240Z. I like the over under style of the rear muffler I remember Abarth back when I had a Fiat 127. It had a sports air cleaner from Abarth. I think Abarth worked very closly with Fiat or Fiat may have been part owner. It was farely popular with the Fiat guys. Back in the early eighties they had a Fiat Ritmo 125TC that was designed by Abarth. It was christened the Golf GTI killer. Abarth was a bit like what BRE was for Datsun.

I should have taken a better look at the website. That is the guy. He doesn't have mush for datsuns, its mostly fiat.

There is a guy called Ling or something that used to sell the stuff here in Nederland. I think its old stock he was selling. Looked like it had been in storage for a while. I have seen a couple of his systems at an Oldtimer day at Zandvoort raceway here in the Netherlands. Abarth systems some awsome, but the systems I saw were no bigger than 2". I think it was intended to give the "standard" 240Z a sportier sound.

If you measure the distance from the front of the bellhousing to the clutch fork you should read about 110mm for a standard clutch give or take a couple of mm for wear and tolerances. This is on a standarx clutch and aftermarketunit could vary a little. This will give the slave cylinder about 10mm IIRC. The slave cylinder has a small spring behind the piston to remove slack in the mechanicals. If the collar is too long this piston will be pushed right back hard and the clutch will not release completly. If you can't push the clutch fork into the slave cylinder, then you have a problem. This could be your problem and shortening the push rod could be enough to solve the problem. Edit: I see you have an old style slave with push rod. Mist that with all the 280zx stuff. If you are using the older style it needs an external spring to pull the fork back to the slave cylinder. To adjust it remove the spring. The piston should bottom out by adjusting the fork and them turn the nut 1-1/2 turns back. Replace spring. That will give you the correct free play in this type. If there is not enough adjustment to do this then you have a problem with mismatched parts.

It was probably over adjusted when someone maybe tried to raise pedal height. The self adjuster shouldn't do that if working correctly. The FSM mention several methods to adjust the brakes. In the later 280Z its by activating and releasing the handbrake. Dave did a very nice job restoring it

Yeah, Datsunparts llc, something not quite right about the colour. Banzai has a very close matching colour from what I have read from other forum users.

Hey Bart, Banzai sells can of the datsun engine colour. http://zzxdatsun.com/catBits.php If you need an alternative to 240tom for some reason.

I have a 1977 280Z which similar to 76 model. I don't think they have a screen as such. If it did I would have blocked mine with sealant when I treated it. They do have a inner chamber to prevent air lock when cornering with the tank low on fuel. I was having a lot of problems with gunk in the filter I fitted before the pump. Draining the fuel didn't help so I ended up treating the tank. Its back breaking work and my kids are just getting over having to help. They sort of forgiven me. You need to use a chemical that will disolve fuel varnish, other fuel sediment and rust. Try to fill to tube and use a wire to work the sediment loose. I used a kit from KBS, but there are other brands available. You could try the cleaning solution in the kit to dislodge the material and clean the tank in the process. The photos are Row 1: Before treatment Row 2: After Aqua klean Row 3: After Tank Sealer Row 4: Tank repainted