TKR514

Yes (and yes). Both the intake and exhaust manifolds will bolt up to the N/A head. What's more important is that if you add a turbocharger is that you get the turbo head and cam. Then there is the ignition control, etc, etc,

Yea, bolts right in. Use the speedo cog from the 77 and all is good!

Thanks Mike! I'll give her a call tomorrow morning. I have never rebuilt a turbo engine before but I'd like the challenge. See ya,

I'd pay more than that...but pics would dictate how much more. Can ya post a few to give me an idea? Also, I assume it's title is clear? I had some trouble with the last "quick sale" I bought. Basically a bitch and a half to get it registered and on the road w/o one.... Thanks!!!

I'd be interested if ya had a ballpark figure on what you'd take. I'm looking for a restore project that needs work to get it going again. Thanks!

Where and how much? I might be interested if it's near Texas. THANKS!

VERY NICE!!!!

Bunch of Jerks... I can't believe that folks would bomb others like that for the simple reason of trying to making others affraid. Hope the are found and made accountable.

The early Z's had "just enough" strengh to do the job without flexing too much. If you remove that upper member of the body, you remove that minimum strength in the top of the car and things might start bending if you drive it hard. The ZX had a "doubler" in the roof and heavier "B pillars" to carry that load between front/rear suspension a LOT better than earlier cars by design. Only guess is that you woulf need a similar structure to carry the loads and stresses that a ZX has. Here is someone that has the old add for one: http://www.classiczcars.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=9598

Blue book in that States seems to be running about half that... Nice example of a 2+2 though.

Speeding uses more fuel? More than what? My Z at 90mph uses less fuel than an SUV at 70, than a truck at 70, than a motor home, than an airplane, etc. Why do YOU care how I use the fuel that I purchase?

BOGUS! If oil was running out, then they would NOT be tighening EPA emmissions. They have to tighen the emmissions cause there is so much oil for the forseable future that they feel that they have to mandate the limit. If you think Hydrogen is an answer to emmisions, that's also as BOGUS as thinking that an electric car is zero emmisions. Truth is, BOTH Hydrogen and Electric require tons of emmisions to creat it to recharge a car or to generate hydrogen and cool it. You just move the emissions to a different place with those 2 options. I guess that this was all a joke, right?