Jump to content

sblake01

Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sblake01

  1. Having a plate on and car and paying for them are two different things.......
  2. sblake01 replied to mbarjbar's post in a topic in Wheels & Brakes
    Cool.
  3. sblake01 replied to mbarjbar's post in a topic in Wheels & Brakes
    In reading the copy on the site, I don't see anything that indicates that they plan to make these with the correct bolt pattern for an S30. Other than the line: "can CNC drill for other applications". They seem to be making them for British Leyland cars. The custom drilling would likely raise the price beyond the stated $180 ea.
  4. sblake01 replied to Oiluj's post in a topic in Interior
    $3.00 for a screw that probably would cost less than 30 cents at a hardware store.
  5. That's how I sold my three Datsuns last year. The prices I posted here were $1500-2500 less than I posted anywhere else. Anyone who would have bought them based on the ads on this site would have got a better deal. The 280Z and the 320 sold for more than I originally wanted and the 810 sold for the exact amount I originally wanted.
  6. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    It's all Greek to me! (Well, except for what Moonpup said.)
  7. sblake01 replied to mchong75's post in a topic in Help Me !!
    That would work as long as you block the passages properly so that the throttle isn't bypassed which would cause a constant fast idle.
  8. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    This thread was off track when things like brochures, defroster wires, and Solex's were brought up. What has taken place in the thread was/is more interesting and informative than the car itself anyway. The car is a rag: period. Some say it shoud be restored but come on, no one is really going to put the kind of money and effort into this particular example unless the simply have an adiding interest in Datsun history. It is, after all. #400 not #004. Rick, I'm glad you got my meaning. You only have about 8 years or so on me so I too must rely on a 40 year old memory to talk about the 70s so I can't be accused of throwing stones in a glass house. "Posting to see the reaction" as I said is totally different from "posting with intention of irritation" as Chris said. I was not accusing you of the latter, in fact, I was not accusing at all, just making an observation. The latter would be a description of what our Ohio based 'mostly stock and original' 280Z owner does. Moonpup, I feel your pain.......
  9. Nah, those would be different. No circle, wider, and not as tall. I had one.
  10. Not really sure how useful that info is in this case. It sounds to me like you either also had a bad cold start valve or you've done other things to affect the mixture/volume of fuel upon start up. When everything is right, the cold start valve only runs as long as the thermotime switch allows it to which is, as I recall, a total of 8 seconds. Cams, air/fuel wideband's etc. are aftermarket mods and lead to a different troubleshooting algorithm than that of a stock system.
  11. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    You seem to be the one making that determination. Not only about what is posted but also it's intent. As I said: To which I'll throw it to back your're own words:
  12. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    Stop reading the 'tone' and simply read the information. The only reason I said what I said about Rick is that he's the one that was quoted. If he can post what he posts then Alan or anyone else should be able to react to it. This section is 'Open Zcar Discussion', right? The tone is really hard to discern in the written word anyway........
  13. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    Sorry, zcar70, but in this case (as in many others) I have to agree with Alan. Rick seems to post alot of information based on his own recolletcions and logic. Sometimes I think he does it just to see the reaction. That's my opinion. Am I being nasty for voicing it? If so then you need to take down the first paragraph in you post.......
  14. sblake01 replied to mazda240's post in a topic in Introductions
    Contact Ron at zclocks.com. He could probably tell you anything you need to know. http://zclocks.com/index.htm
  15. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    Not sure. I know the roadster had the option. I actually saw them in the showroon but I have no clue about Nissan's intent for the S30.
  16. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    They were selling the 2000 Roadster with the cam and solexes in the USA then.
  17. sblake01 replied to 260zinsd's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    The link works now. What I don't get is why that black 280Z being washed is in this thread. ?
  18. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    It shouldn't. 00488 didn't have them. I've always heard that no sub 500 vin had them.
  19. sblake01 replied to 260zinsd's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    What was in the link? It's been deleted.
  20. sblake01 replied to moonpup's post in a topic in Open Discussions
    I know for a fact that HLS3000488 was red. I thought it was 110 but Mike B reminded me that it had to be 905 since 110 came later. You know, my advancing CRS......
  21. Many things can cause that. Vacuum leaks, bad BCDD, bad altitude switch (Cali cars), bad EGR, etc.
  22. sblake01 replied to z 1975's post in a topic in Electrical
    And you have the 81 ZXT ECU?
  23. sblake01 replied to z 1975's post in a topic in Electrical
    The L28 ET uses a totally different and system than a 75. ECCS vs EFI. The wiring is different, the ECU is different, etc. You're going to have to do the research.
  24. sblake01 replied to cdarch's post in a topic in Help Me !!
    It's just a standard ballast resistor. Fits several cars. Go to your local Checker, Shucks, Kragen, O'Reilly (whatever it's called in your part of the country) and ask for a BWD ballast resistor, part number RU504.
  25. sblake01 replied to Mikez73's post in a topic in Open Chit Chat
    I've got that one bookmarked and have used it but it has quite a few dead links.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.