Jump to content

240260280z

Free Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 240260280z

  1. Maxima chamber volume is large! Maxima N47 is 38.5cc My Nissan N47 on Blue is 32.0cc
  2. I just re-assembled one for a friend. The spring was there but the 90 degree spring end that fits in the slot was long gone. I now wonder. What does the spring do? It was interesting that the spring in this 73 had a plastic ring around it. Here is what I am talking about sans ring
  3. The chemical seizing was due to the cast holes in the timing cover that let water seep into the 3 bolt holes of the oil pump. The fourth oil pump bolt with no hole came out easy. The water pump and the scroll in the timing cover were minty as well as the head internals. the motor looked like it was just broken in. The only corroded bolt on the timing cover: Strange to see an N42/N42 combo in a 280zx with all the EFI and PS bolted to it.
  4. 240260280z posted a post in a topic in Open Discussions
    Post lots of pictures and ask lots of questions.... Makes no sense to rebuild the wheels.
  5. 3 of the 4 bolts were seized. There are holes in the bottom of the timing cover that allow water to seep into the 3 bolts. It is ~ 4" of aluminum-steel electrolyses. When rebuilding use anti-seize and be sure to seal these holes. To remove the pump, I first tried penetrating oil and heat to no avail so I resorted to doing what I did in the past... angle grinder the length of the bolts. Worked like a charm.... sorry for the pump but the timing cover is A1. I also used a big cold chisel that made short work of the cast aluminum pump. Once the corroded bolts were exposed I could chip away the aluminum then bend the bolts out. The final job was to use a vice grip to twist out the bolts. The photo is hard to visually decode as the block is almost upside down and there is a sheet of plastic over the exposed bottom ( I stuck one oil pan bolt in to hold the plastic). The gasket also survived
  6. Removed the oil pump:
  7. 240260280z posted a post in a topic in Open Discussions
    73 factory service manual http://www.xenons30.com/files/FSM/1973%20240z%20FSM.zip
  8. There may be numbers on the side of the caps
  9. 240260280z posted a post in a topic in Help Me !!
    DOH! Found it: 1975-1978 Nissan 280Z Head Gasket Nippon Reinz W0133-1634713
  10. 240260280z posted a post in a topic in Help Me !!
    It is from a 280zx w N42 Block Diameter is 89.4mm Squished height is 1.04mm I can faintly see 12 NR Z embosed between the timing chain hole and cylinder #1 The oil seal is copper. Sealing rings are steel. Seems like some faint baby blue colours I am guessing NRZ is Nippon-Reinz?
  11. Looking forward to turning wrenches! Let me know if you need anything. I just pulled apart a weird early 280zx motor (with 1 piece fuel rail) that seems to have had an N42 head. I am guessing it was swapped at one time but on the outside it looks otherwise. I'll pull the head tonight and find out.
  12. Looks like it is earlier than late Jan '71 A Series 1.
  13. Fire up the grill, I'll be in Seattle in June for 2 weeks.
  14. I concur. I like to remove the jet and clean with a scotchbrite pad or fine sand paper. Spray the tube where the jet slides with carb cleaner
  15. FYI the ball bearings in 1/2 shafts are 7/16" http://www.classiczcars.com/topic/39774-halfshaft-internal-ball-bearing-hardness/ metric - smetric
  16. Source:http://www.improvedtouring.com/forums/showthread.php?23288-Which-Intake-Manifold-for-a-240Z&s=188653bfe00de2be0d6f11b4e3afdadf KThomas Jan 16 2008 E88 or N33, whichever you have that's prettier. Rebello used to claim 10 hp or something stupid like that. We couldn't show enough difference on an east coast dyno to matter. Our ARRC wins were with an E88. Needles- they need to look like a telephone pole. More metal, not less. SM's, N27's and anything "ground on" will be too fat. N27 was stock for 1971, N54 for 1972. I think we ran something closer to an N58. With everything in perfect blueprint (bottom end, valve placement, cam, and carbs) and a decent header, you'll be too fat up to 5500 rpm and too lean past 6800. So we slow the suction piston down and live with a little leanness over 7200. We used [secret] for the damper oil, so 20w or 10w30 is fine. I don't believe in lighter, like ATF. Makes the piston come up too fast and runs fat. Now the old school thinking was get the piston up quick so there's no restriction. ATF for damper oil was the rage back in the 70's. Ive found that it just doesn't make horsepower that way. Rich mixture will cure a lot of ills, for example you can run zero point gap (if you had points) on a Z if you put enough gas in it. But if the rest of your system is blueprint you don't need to be rich, you need to be lean. Mixture control is more important than flow up to about 6800. There are some very competent Z pilots out there running the Rebello method of no oil whatsoever, so the piston slams up to the top soon as you crack the throttle. Those guys never beat me. And my car idles and drives around the pits without spitting black smoke all over the place. I like my way. In the end you need a bigger jet to take care of the over 7000 lean problem, but then you're in for custom needles. It isn't really a problem, you won't melt a piston, but there is a few more horsepower up there to be had. The stock jet limits you. But having said that you should be able to win races with everything perfectly stock, and we never made it to the bigger jet part (we ran to 7400 rpm at Road Atlanta, 7200 tops anywhere else). You really need a good O2 sensor on each bank (I used cyl's 2 and 5) and a HAL30 or similar lambda or air/fuel sensor. We were fortunate to do our tuning with a proper engine dyno, but if I was on a budget I'd put the instrumentation in car for test days when you can look (I've decided driver's don't see anything during a race unless it's a big blinking red light). Uh, the secret oil is secret because I forgot what the mix was. Man, i miss my brain... One other thing on the operation of SU's. The common knowledge was running lighter oil in the damper allowed the piston to go up faster and hence you were at a lower point on the needle and therefore had more jet area exposed which equalled richer, which everybody associated with more power. The factory will tell you that slowing the damper down with thicker oil created a bigger vacuum, which resulted in more gas being pulled past the needle and hence a richer mixture. That was the case I always found on street cars, they ran better with thicker, or proper, damper oil. Now that counters what I just told you in the previous post. We slowed the piston down to make it leaner. However, we're talking about two different regions of piston travel, rpm, and vacuum. The region of piston travel we care about on the track is the upper 1/3 of travel. On the street, the first 2/3. For rpm, above 4000 for track, below 4000 for street. For street rpm the throttle and piston position can affect vacuum greatly, for race the throttle is always full open when it isn't full closed (you Z pilots got that, right? Full open, there is no part throttle or "feathering" in a Z. If you can't do that we need to talk about shocks and setup), so vacuum is more a function of rpm, and less affected by the last 1/3 of piston travel than it is with the first 2/3. What we were slowing down was the last 1/3 of piston travel (and running stock like oil to have stock like piston response in the street range of throttle position and rpm). On a stock setup, when you open the throttle at 4000 rpm the piston pretty much goes straight to the top. The needle is essentially out of the jet so what is affecting your mixture is the vacuum over the jet bridge caused by increasing rpm. It ain't the piston moving the needle in the jet as you go from 4000 to 7000 rpm. So we slowed up the last 1/3 of travel, ran long needles with very little taper at the end, and lived with lean mixtures above 7k. There used to be a video showing the piston movement during a dyno pull on ZTherapy's website. That was mine, very early in our engine program. Headers will affect mixture, so YMMV. katman Manifolds Your right there is a bit of a difference. The walls seperating cyl2-3 and 4-5 on the e-88s have less of a taper from the carb side than the n-33's which are reatively blunt. I have not seen an n-36 to compare, but have heard they are either similar or identical to the n-33. We're gonna try each (e-88 and n-33) just to see how the different runners affeect it if at all. My sneaking suspicion is Katmans right that we are best off with the purtiest one.
  17. Try swapping carb #2 with carb #3
  18. 240260280z posted a post in a topic in Open Discussions
    Your called me and requested this song:
  19. CO I think he has gone all megajolt on us.
  20. Is that for a V8?
  21. this was on the second link: Why Datsun Parts LLC? We are a professional licensed Datsun Restoration Business. Our parts are backed with a 100% money back satisfaction guarantee. All we sell are quality new and restored parts that are sure to fit your special application. Our goal is customer loyalty and we want your return business. Our feedback rating is one of the best and our website is listed with several customer reviews.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.