Jump to content

Mike B

Member
  • Posts

    2,195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Mike B

  1. Don't worry Alan, based on the auction results, it appears that there were several people that want to take on that restoration project. Two people were even willing to pay $10k or more for the opportunity. I am not one of them, but I wish them luck. I just hope they are aware of what they are getting into with that car. I agree and I can think of at least one early production car that is definitely not 100% concours correct yet is very much appreciated by the Z community . -Mike
  2. There were a couple of people interested in the car that contacted me, so went to look at it last weekend. I have some pictures I took for them, but I'm not sure if I should post them in this thread. I don't know if the people ended up bidding or not. The seller mentioned he had some people that were very interested and I'll just leave it at that. When I saw the car I knew it was much more of a project than I would personally want to take on. The front end had previous damage (the hood and radiator support weren't correct for an early car). There was quite a bit of rust damage including the battery area and floors, as noted. I think the drivers quarter was replaced at some point. It didn't have the VIN plate on the drivers door side post and didn't even have the holes were it would have been mounted. It was missing most of the early unique parts. It has a horizontal defroster on the hatch glass, instead of the early glass with no defroster. The dash was from a 72 or 73 and most everything in the interior needs to be replaced. I was also very surprised by both the bidding and the reserve. I thought the bidding probably won't go above $5k and I was guessing the seller had the reserve around $10k. It would be very expensive to restore this car with the required body work, missing and damaged parts, and seized engine. The only people interested would be someone that REALLY wanted a low VIN car. Edit - I also wanted to mention that the seller said he had rolled the car out of the garage and taken additional pictures that he was sending bidders that asked for them. I'm not sure what the pictures were of, or how many there were. Hopefully the people that bid it up so high had some more pictures to go by. I personally wouldn't bid any where near that level without more pictures and even then you can get burned. Much better to look at the car in person. -Mike
  3. Like this one? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Datsun-240z-260-280z-NOS-Cam-Oiler-Tube-Oil-Spray-Bar-/140499520549?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item20b66c8c25 -Mike
  4. Those are interesting Ron. Where would I find them? I'm like Kats in that I really like the look of the headlight covers, but I am hesitant to put holes in my original FRP headlight buckets. If I do decide to mount them I think I will use a spare set of metal headlight buckets. I wouldn't care about putting holes in metal covers and I wouldn't worry about the FRP ones cracking. -Mike
  5. Hi Ron, I meant that I believe they are original OEM Nissan parts and not reproductions. When I bought them I was told they were NOS, but without the boxes or hardware. Since the reproductions also don't come with boxes or hardware, I was always skeptical of that claim. See my earlier post #33. The thing that makes me think they are OEM, now that I see them again, is they have the black foam gasket with the gap that Esprist described as being original as compared to the gray gaskets that he noted the reproductions have. From his post #32... Also, he posted in this other thread about the gap in the gasket on the OEM ones... http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/showpost.php?p=283627&postcount=34 Finally, I am confident the used set I have are original rings, given the circumstances of where I got them, and both sets of rings fit the same and look to be constructed the same, as opposed to the reproduction rings which don't look like they fit correctly where they come together at the front, as shown in this picture from another thread http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/showpost.php?p=275419&postcount=25. As for the part number, I don't really know, but the hole location seems to be the same as the ones that are shown in the old US Datsun Competition catalogs. -Mike
  6. I finally got my headlight covers out of storage. Based on the information in other posts, it looks like they are originals after all. I think they are unused, but have some minor shelf wear. The black gaskets don't look like they have been mounted. I don't have the mounting hardware, but that should be pretty easy to recreate. I also have a spare set of the used original trim rings. They both fit the covers the same and look to have the same construction. -Mike
  7. That's funny. I had emailed this guy a few years ago after seeing his car listed on Carl's Zhome registry, since he was located so close to me. I never got a reply. I don't think I am up for another project Z though and I already have my low VIN blue car. Not sure that I buy the "mule" story in the ad: "The car, HLS30-00022, was originall not intended for sale to the general public but rather like the rest of the original 25 cars were intended to be training and sales tools or what is known as "Production mules". that was the fate of this car. It was a mule for the Datsun dealer in Portland Or." -Mike
  8. I'd say it is time for a new (to you) cowl. I'd also check and see what the drainage area looks like under the cowl. -Mike
  9. HLS30.com did a write-up on how to remove the glass from the review mirror a year or two ago http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24194. After it is removed you can get the back side resilvered. I took a couple spares apart a year ago, but haven't gotten around to getting them resilvered and reassembled yet. -Mike
  10. I went back and fixed my post #71 for you Arne . I need to learn that Jedi mind-trick technique... "These are not the wheels you are looking for..." -Mike
  11. Hi Ron, Yes, it is being taped off for spray-on paintable bedliner in the wheel wells and I decided to carry it up on the top of the inner fenders too for additional protection. I debated about whether I wanted anything other than just the primer and paint, since the early cars didn't have much, if any, real undercoating. The bedliner doesn't have a lot of texture, so it won't really be that noticeable after it is painted. I'm not one for changing colors, so I will be staying with the original 904 white, but with a base and clear coat instead of a single stage. White is not my favorite color, but not my least favorite either, so kind of middle of the road for me. After seeing pictures of Diseazed's white 1970 I think it will look similar after it is done (borrowed photo attached below). I plan to put a BRE spook on it and leave it black. There was an original black spook on the car when I got it, so I think it will be nice to put one back on to retain a bit of the car's history. I plan on upgrading this car a bit too, so the spook will be a good addition anyway. I will also put of a set of 15" American Racing LeMans wheels on the car. -Mike
  12. Here are the latest pictures from today. The epoxy primer coat is done on the shell. I am hoping to get the car back by the end of January. -Mike
  13. Carl, The flat one is correct for a 1970. They added the hood on series two cars I think. On the early cars like yours it would have been made of grey plastic too (to match the radio face plate, and heater control panel). -Mike
  14. Here is a set on ebay with a $15 starting bid and no bids yet http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/DATSUN-240-280-1971-1972-1973-Hood-Side-Panel-Doors-/320636440977?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item4aa76bd191. -Mike
  15. Yep, you are right, they are 14". I didn't think to look at the tire. Now that I look at the rim on my desktop computer I can make out the 14 now. Sorry about that. -Mike
  16. Yes, they are 6" width. You measure the width from inner bead to inner bead with the tires off the rim https://www.rsracing.com/tech-wheel.html. Those also look like they are stamped 13" (diameter), not 14". -Mike
  17. I'm almost positive that you could use the later style two sided 240z locks on a series one car. Obviously the internals are different, but externally there shouldn't be any differences. The locks for a 260Z or 280Z may have different linkage connections or other differences though. Randy, can you post a picture of what your locks look like? I should be able to take a picture of some series one locks tomorrow for comparison. -Mike
  18. Sorry, I didn't see your question before WingZr0. The little blue insert signs have various service related words that can be combined to advertise certain service promotions. I am attaching a picture I found on the internet of the exact same sign/clock that is at the Datsun Heritage Museum. It is the only other one I have seen. I am also attaching some more dealer sign pictures. The Datsun Leasing sign appears to be the same form as mine, but without the clock and sign inserts. It was sold on ebay with a BIN after someone contacted the seller and got him to end the auction early :mad:. Too bad for the seller. I was going to bid more than he got for it. The other signs are ones I found on the internet. I think they are from Australia. The last picture is another dealer flag I just got. -Mike
  19. Yes, it was interesting to see that the hidden writing survived the liquid stripper. I can't take any credit for the body and paint work. My abilities are limited to taking it apart and putting it all back together. I can't wait to see #33 restored, since it is a twin to my #32. Thanks Ron. I think it worked out well to graft it in behind the TC rod mounts. The body guy had to take the different layers apart and then weld them back together. He has the in process pictures on his camera, so I will get them when I get the car back and can post them if people are interested. If I had known I would actually end up using the whole clip I would have been a lot more careful when I cut it off. Fortunately the battery tray on #210 was in great shape. That area was totally rusted through on the donor car. -Mike
  20. After evaluating the condition of the front end, we discovered more damage than originally expected due to to the collision that caused the car to be parked in the mid 80's. The passenger side front rail and inner fender were also damaged in a prior collision and not repaired well. I had kept the front clip from another early car that I parted a few years ago, so we decided to use it to replace the entire front end on the car. Here are some pictures of the front end mocked up for fit. Everything, including the NOS fenders and doors, lined up great. The last few pictures are with it all welded back together now. He's still cleaning up the engine bay and it needs a little more minor body work, but hopefully it will ready for primer before too long. -Mike
  21. Jim Frederick sells repro sets of the rubber fuel/brake line blocks. Email him at jim240z@aol.com. -Mike
  22. I doubt it based on his comment above. I have a set of used red plastic panels and vinyl in storage, but I would rather sell them as a set or at least all the panels together. PM me if you are interested. -Mike
  23. As I have mentioned before, one of the primary places I buy new Nissan parts is at nissanpartsnow.com. It is the website of Conyers Nissan in Georgia and their prices are usually the lowest I have found online (I normally compare prices to nissanparts.cc and courtesyparts.com to double check though). I got an email the other day about a $10 coupon they have now for orders of $100 or more placed before the end of the year. FREE10 Use this coupon code to receive an extra $10 off any order over $100.00 Simply enter FREE10 during the checkout process when prompted. We will modify your order before it ships out. Valid on orders placed from 12/21/2010 to 12/31/2010. May not be used on prior orders. Can not be combined with other sales, discounts or special offers. -Mike
  24. 08360-51226 http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/showpost.php?p=272033&postcount=5 -Mike
  25. No, it wasn't about you. It was in regards to posts by "John-Sparks" in a car-cover thread that has since been locked, deleted and I think "John-Sparks" was banned from the site. Take a look at post #177 above. Good luck with the sale. -Mike
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.