Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'm curious is a triple SU setup for an L24 worth the bother??

There's a manifold and some roundtops to go with it up for sale and I'm curious as to whether it would actually be worth the time and money and if so, how much would you pay for such a thing?

Link to comment
https://www.classiczcars.com/topic/12098-opinionsknowledge-on-triple-sus/
Share on other sites


The guy claims they were bought for a now abandoned 260Z project, I assume nothing particularly relating to the triples but probably more the lack of finding cheap parts in NZ.

You'll have to excuse the spelling etc, it's taken directly from his text.

---

tripple s u's for datsun abandond project

four 6 cylander L series. Has been done overseas. Manifold is allimuium. four carbs one for spare.

4053794_full.jpg

To me the length of the 3,4 runners seem possibly long enough to cause issues but I have no idea when it comes down to it, anyone have anything to add?

Obviously all the linkages will still have to be made etc. but if it goes for cheap enough it may be worth it. perhaps....

I've got a mate who has 3 SU's on his 260 2+2. He loves 'em.. and it did make a difference on the amount of power the car had.

I'd be looking on Jag sites to see if the "correct" way of doing it is to have 2 lefts and a right, or the other way 'round.

  • 7 months later...

i heard somewhere (don't remember but i know it was a reliable source) that the triple SU setup was not very efficient, and the benefits over a twin SU system were miniscule. the reasoning was because of the setup of the standard I-6 engine. because the firing of the cylinders is set-up the way it is (i don't know the firing order off the top of my head) the usage of both of the twin SUs is equal and regular. when the third SU is thrown in there it offsets the system and causes irregularities throughout the entire intake system. basically you get uneven and irregular usage out of each of the carbs.

i heard somewhere (don't remember but i know it was a reliable source) that the triple SU setup was not very efficient, and the benefits over a twin SU system were miniscule. the reasoning was because of the setup of the standard I-6 engine. because the firing of the cylinders is set-up the way it is (i don't know the firing order off the top of my head) the usage of both of the twin SUs is equal and regular. when the third SU is thrown in there it offsets the system and causes irregularities throughout the entire intake system. basically you get uneven and irregular usage out of each of the carbs.

1-5-3-6-2-4

Therefore, if the carbs were labeled A-B-C from the front of the car you'd have ACBCAB instead of the normal ABABAB. Each carb would be used once, have a one cylinder gap, be used again, and then have to wait for 3 cylinders.

We had 2 club members run the triple SU setup (with Aussie designed special run inlet manifold - only 12 or so made) & they were very good cars on both road & racetrack.

I think a lot has to do with (a) inlet manifold design (B) camshaft specs etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,366 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.